Skip to main content

Security report for graphicriver.net

Envato Pty Ltd · E-commerce · Australia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GraphicRiver, operated by Envato Pty Ltd, is a prominent online marketplace specializing in digital graphic assets such as fonts, logos, icons, and templates. It serves a global community of designers and businesses, offering a wide range of high-quality, hand-reviewed creative resources. The platform is well-integrated within the Envato ecosystem, promoting related services like Envato Elements and Placeit, enhancing its market reach and user engagement. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Turbo, StimulusJS, and integrates advanced analytics and monitoring tools like Google Analytics, Datadog, and Rollbar. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, ensuring a smooth user experience. From a security perspective, GraphicRiver enforces HTTPS, uses CSRF tokens, and manages cookie consent via Cookiebot, reflecting a strong security posture with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is robust, with comprehensive policies and GDPR adherence clearly indicated. Overall, GraphicRiver presents as a highly professional, trustworthy, and technically mature platform with a strong business model and market position.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of graphicriver.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching graphicriver.net

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
44
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GraphicRiver holds a leading position in the e-commerce sector for digital design assets, leveraging Envato's extensive ecosystem and brand reputation. Its business model centers on a marketplace facilitating transactions between creators and buyers, generating revenue through sales commissions and affiliate programs. The platform targets creative professionals and businesses seeking affordable, high-quality design resources. Strategic partnerships with Envato Elements, Placeit, and Tuts+ expand its service offerings and customer base. The presence of B Corp certification and extensive user reviews further enhance its credibility. Growth indicators include a large inventory of over 800,000 items and active promotion of unlimited subscription services. The company maintains consistent branding and transparent policies, supporting sustained market trust and competitive advantage.

Security posture

GraphicRiver exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and integration of security monitoring tools like Rollbar. The site employs CSRF protection in forms and manages user consent effectively through Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the analyzed content. However, explicit security policy and incident response information are not publicly available, representing an area for improvement. The platform's use of reputable third-party services for analytics and consent management further strengthens its security framework. Overall, the security measures align well with industry best practices for e-commerce platforms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and user protections.
  2. Provide clear incident response and abuse contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user education on privacy and security features through accessible documentation and support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Envato Pty Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Envato Pty Ltd
Description
GraphicRiver is a dynamic marketplace offering thousands of design assets including graphics, vectors, icons, and templates, empowering designers and businesses with professional resources to elevate their creative projects.
Key services
Fonts, Logos, Icons, Graphics, Design templates
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Datadog, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Rollbar
Frameworks
Turbo (Hotwire), StimulusJS
Platforms
Envato Market ecosystem
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Cookie consent management via Cookiebot
  • Use of security monitoring via Rollbar
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Datadog
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Microsoft Advertising
Tracking pixels
Datadog, Cookiebot, Rollbar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot
  2. Strong integration with Envato ecosystem and partner sites
  3. Multiple categories and extensive product offerings
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. Clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, custom technology stack utilizing Turbo and StimulusJS for dynamic content and interactivity. It leverages advanced analytics and monitoring tools such as Google Analytics, Datadog, and Rollbar to track performance and user behavior. The site is optimized for fast loading and mobile responsiveness, with comprehensive SEO and accessibility features. Hosting appears to be managed within the Envato ecosystem or via trusted CDNs, ensuring reliability and scalability. The technical implementation reflects a high level of digital maturity, supporting a seamless user experience and robust operational capabilities. Opportunities exist to further document and expose security and compliance frameworks to users and partners.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 80/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with graphicriver.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review graphicriver.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.