Skip to main content

Security report for graphicriver.net

Envato · E-commerce · Australia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GraphicRiver is a well-established online marketplace operated by Envato, specializing in digital design assets such as fonts, logos, icons, and graphics. Founded in 2006, it serves a global community of graphic designers and businesses seeking professional creative resources. The platform is part of the larger Envato ecosystem, which includes subscription services and creative tutorial sites, positioning GraphicRiver as a key player in the digital creative marketplace sector. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Datadog for monitoring, Cookiebot for consent management, and Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, supported by structured data and comprehensive metadata for SEO. The use of robust domain registration practices and HTTPS ensures a secure and trustworthy user experience. From a security perspective, GraphicRiver exhibits strong practices such as domain locking, HTTPS enforcement, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, there is room for improvement by enabling DNSSEC and publishing a security.txt file to enhance vulnerability disclosure transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or security issues were detected in the analysis. Overall, GraphicRiver presents a low-risk profile with high business credibility, excellent content quality, and good privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing DNS security, formalizing security policies, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts to maintain a strong security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching graphicriver.net

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GraphicRiver operates as a digital marketplace targeting graphic designers and businesses worldwide, offering a wide range of creative assets at competitive prices. Its business model is based on facilitating transactions between creators and buyers, generating revenue through sales commissions and partnerships. The platform benefits from Envato's strong brand and ecosystem, including subscription services and educational resources, which enhance customer retention and cross-selling opportunities. The presence of affiliate tracking and advertising partnerships indicates diversified revenue streams. The company maintains a large user base and a mature market presence, supported by consistent branding and professional content delivery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, domain registration protections, and cookie consent aligned with GDPR. Use of Cloudflare CDN provides additional security layers such as DDoS mitigation. Error monitoring via Rollbar indicates proactive incident detection. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The security score is high but could be improved with formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms and enhanced DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and enhance DNS security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency by publishing a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  5. Implement continuous security awareness training and monitoring to maintain and improve security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Envato
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Envato
Description
GraphicRiver is a dynamic marketplace offering thousands of design assets including graphics, vectors, icons, and templates, empowering designers and businesses with professional resources to elevate their creative projects.
Key services
Fonts, Logos, Icons, Graphics, Design templates
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Datadog monitoring, Cookiebot consent management, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS and CDN
Frameworks
Turbo (Hotwire Turbo), Rollbar for error tracking
Platforms
Envato Market platform
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with registrar status flags
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Use of Cloudflare for DNS and CDN protection
  • Rollbar error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Datadog
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Google AdSense, Microsoft Advertising
Tracking pixels
Datadog, Cookiebot pixel
Marketing tools
Rollbar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce marketplace for digital design assets.
  2. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  5. No explicit or adult content detected.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Turbo (Hotwire), and integrates monitoring and analytics tools such as Datadog and Google Analytics. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring fast content delivery and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD data. Performance is fast with preloading of critical assets. The CMS appears to be custom-built for the Envato marketplace ecosystem, providing scalability and integration with multiple Envato services.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low24 findingsView report
  2. 80/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with graphicriver.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review graphicriver.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.