Skip to main content

Security report for grangeinsurance.com

Grange Insurance · Other · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Grange Insurance is a well-established insurance provider specializing in auto, home, business, renters, and condo insurance products. The company partners with independent insurance agents to offer customizable coverage options, targeting consumers primarily in the United States. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, customer testimonials, and clear calls to action for existing and prospective customers. The business emphasizes trust and longevity, highlighting an A.M. Best 'A' Excellent rating sustained for 50 years. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and other marketing and tracking tools. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though some improvements could be made in security headers and explicit security policies. The presence of cookie consent banners and privacy policies indicates a commitment to privacy compliance, including GDPR considerations. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure cookie practices but lacks visible security headers and a published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and branding strongly suggest legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional transparency and technical controls. The overall risk assessment is moderate with recommendations to improve domain registration transparency, implement security headers, and publish security policies. These steps would enhance trust and compliance, supporting the company’s strong market position and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching grangeinsurance.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Grange Insurance operates in the insurance sector with a business model focused on partnering with independent agents to distribute customizable insurance products. Their market position is that of a longstanding regional insurer with over 85 years of history and a strong financial rating. The company targets individual consumers and businesses seeking insurance coverage in auto, home, and commercial lines. Revenue streams likely include premiums from these insurance products. The partnership ecosystem includes agent portals and third-party solutions platforms, indicating a collaborative distribution approach. Growth indicators include digital engagement and customer testimonials. Strategic observations highlight a focus on trust, customer service, and leveraging digital marketing and analytics for customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent are implemented. However, the lack of visible security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, HSTS) and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks that require ongoing management. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which is critical for trust. Overall, the security culture appears functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency, policy publication, and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve site security.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Grange Insurance
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grange Insurance
Description
Grange partners with independent insurance agents to provide customizable insurance coverage. Experience the ease of doing business with Grange.
Key services
Auto insurance, Home insurance, Business insurance, Renters insurance, Condo insurance, Life insurance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Mouseflow, Clarity
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Marketing tools
Zoominfo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong presence of tracking and marketing scripts indicating extensive user analytics.
  3. No visible security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML; phone and physical address clearly provided.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  7. Social media presence across major platforms consistent with brand.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of JavaScript libraries and tracking technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The CMS or hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS with fallback support for older browsers. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking. Opportunities exist to modernize security controls and improve domain registration transparency to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with grangeinsurance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review grangeinsurance.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.