Skip to main content

Security report for govpredict.com

Quorum · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Quorum is a technology company specializing in AI-powered public affairs software designed to help organizations map, track, and influence policy landscapes at federal, state, local, and international levels. Their platform offers comprehensive legislative tracking, grassroots advocacy tools, stakeholder engagement, PAC management, and AI-driven policy analysis. Positioned as a leading SaaS provider in the government affairs and public policy sector, Quorum serves public affairs professionals and advocacy groups with a unified, data-driven approach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Osano for consent management, and various analytics and marketing tools. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses cookie consent mechanisms, and integrates reputable third-party services. However, explicit security headers and incident response contacts are not publicly evident, and no vulnerability disclosure policy is found. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the domain and website content indicate a legitimate and professionally maintained business. Overall, Quorum's website reflects a high level of professionalism, security awareness, and compliance with privacy regulations, making it a trustworthy platform for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching govpredict.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Quorum operates in the government and technology sectors, targeting public affairs professionals and organizations involved in policy advocacy. Their SaaS business model focuses on subscription-based software solutions that integrate AI to enhance legislative tracking and stakeholder engagement. The company leverages partnerships with reputable organizations and maintains a strong presence through customer testimonials, case studies, and industry recognition such as G2 ratings. Their marketing ecosystem includes advanced analytics and consent management tools, supporting data-driven growth and compliance. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a controlled communication channel via forms, typical for enterprise SaaS companies. Quorum's strategic positioning as an AI innovator in public affairs software provides competitive advantages in a niche but critical market segment.

Security posture

Quorum's website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS and a visible cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR compliance. The use of Osano for consent management and Marketo for marketing automation indicates attention to privacy and data protection. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options in the visible HTML is a potential area for improvement. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could limit transparency in security incident handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly document a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
  2. Verify and enforce comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish incident response contact information to facilitate timely reporting and handling of security issues.
  4. Continue maintaining GDPR and privacy compliance with clear, user-friendly consent mechanisms.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Quorum
Description
Quorum provides AI-powered public affairs software that helps users map, track, change, and report on policy landscapes across federal, state, local, and international levels.
Key services
Legislative and regulatory tracking, Grassroots advocacy, Stakeholder engagement, PAC management, AI-powered policy analysis, Government contact data
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Marketo Munchkin, Osano Consent Management, Typekit Fonts, Convert Experiences, Ahrefs Site Audit, VocalVideo embeds, Swiper Carousel
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Ahrefs Analytics, Marketo Munchkin
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Reddit Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin, Ahrefs Analytics
Marketing tools
Convert Experiences, Marketo, Osano Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, contact via forms
  4. Strong branding and trust signals including customer logos and G2 ratings
  5. Use of modern web technologies and marketing/analytics tools
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and robust technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Osano, and various analytics and marketing tools. The site uses Typekit for fonts and Swiper for carousels, ensuring a rich user experience. Performance is optimized with preconnects, preloads, and asynchronous script loading. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features are well implemented. The site architecture supports SEO best practices with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No significant technical debt or outdated components were detected, indicating good maintenance and modernization efforts. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the use of Cloudfront CDN is noted for some scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with govpredict.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review govpredict.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.