Skip to main content

Security report for glide.page

Glide · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glide is a leading no-code app builder platform that empowers businesses to create AI-powered custom applications without writing code. The platform targets a broad range of business users seeking to automate workflows, integrate data sources, and scale operations efficiently. With over 100,000 companies trusting Glide, it holds a strong market position in the no-code and AI-driven software development space. Technically, Glide leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with comprehensive privacy and security policies, including SOC II TYPE 2 certification and GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, though incident response contact details and vulnerability disclosure policies could be improved. Overall, Glide presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically sound platform with moderate user tracking for analytics and marketing purposes.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching glide.page

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Glide operates a SaaS business model focused on no-code AI-powered app creation, serving diverse business sectors primarily within technology. Its competitive advantages include ease of use, AI integration, and extensive customization capabilities. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans and professional services such as custom app development. The company targets business teams across operations, IT, field sales, and more, supported by a robust partner ecosystem and a growing customer base. Strategic observations highlight Glide's emphasis on scalability, automation, and user empowerment, positioning it well for continued growth in the no-code market.

Security posture

Glide exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and adherence to recognized frameworks such as SOC II TYPE 2, GDPR, and CCPA. The presence of a Trust Center and clear privacy policies indicates a strong commitment to data protection. However, the absence of publicly available incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests areas for enhancement. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, Glide's security practices align well with industry standards for SaaS platforms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Establish and publicize a formal vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize supply chain security risks.
  4. Enhance user privacy controls and provide clear data retention policies to strengthen GDPR compliance.
  5. Continue investing in security awareness and culture to maintain high trust and compliance levels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Glide
Description
Glide makes it easy to build and deploy powerful custom apps powered by AI with no code. Create AI-powered business apps that connect your data and tools, automate manual work, and scale as you grow.
Key services
No-code app building, AI-powered app generation, Data integration and management, Workflow automation, Custom portals, dashboards, CRM, inventory, field sales apps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Analytics, Cloudinary, Intercom, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Dreamdata Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics, Dreamdata Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Roadway AI Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Intercom, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Dreamdata Analytics, Roadway AI Analytics, CR Relay Signals
Marketing tools
Intercom, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Dreamdata Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional no-code AI-powered app builder platform.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and targeted at business users.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and use cases enhance trust.
  4. Security and privacy policies are clearly linked and comprehensive.
  5. No WHOIS data available publicly, possibly due to privacy protection.
  6. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used.
  7. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, which supports fast loading times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools indicates a sophisticated digital marketing strategy. The site structure is well-organized with clear navigation and comprehensive content. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible outdated libraries or performance bottlenecks. Opportunities exist to further enhance accessibility features and implement more granular privacy controls. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports Glide's business goals effectively and positions it well for scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with glide.page. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review glide.page.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.