Skip to main content

Security report for gim.lv

SIA Global Internet Marketing · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Global Internet Marketing (GIM) is a Latvian digital marketing agency established in 2014, specializing in creating high-conversion landing pages and managing online advertising campaigns across Google Ads, Facebook, and Instagram. The company serves clients primarily in Latvia, Europe, and Russia, focusing on measurable results and client growth. Their website demonstrates a mature digital presence with comprehensive service descriptions, client testimonials, and certifications in key advertising platforms. Technically, the site employs modern analytics and tracking tools, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Yandex Metrika, alongside a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security measures include HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though some security headers are not explicitly detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the professional presentation and detailed contact information support business credibility. Overall, GIM presents as a trustworthy, small-sized technology sector business with a strong focus on digital marketing services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gim.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GIM positions itself as a results-driven internet marketing agency with a clear focus on client acquisition and sales growth through digital channels. Their business model revolves around service-based revenue from website development, paid advertising setup, and chatbot integration. The company leverages certifications and client testimonials to build trust and differentiate itself in a competitive market. Their target audience includes businesses seeking to enhance online sales and marketing effectiveness in Latvia and neighboring regions. The agency's use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of incident response or security policy pages suggest areas for maturity improvement. The company maintains a modern office environment and emphasizes licensed software use, reflecting operational professionalism.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse on forms, indicating a baseline security posture. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policies aligns with GDPR requirements, enhancing compliance. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security.txt or incident response information, limiting transparency on vulnerability handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for enhancement in headers and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness for security events.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Global Internet Marketing
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Global Internet Marketing
Description
Digitālā mārketinga aģentūra Latvijā, kas izstrādā efektīvas mājas lapas un uzsāk reklāmu internetā – Google Adwords, Facebook, Instagram, SEO utt. Mērķis ir jaunu klientu piesaiste no interneta.
Key services
Mājas lapas izstrāde (Landing Page), Google Ads reklāmas iestatīšana, Facebook reklāmas iestatīšana, Facebook Messenger tērzēšanas bots
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2 Invisible, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Google Maps API, CookieScript consent management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form spam protection
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
CookieScript
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional Latvian digital marketing agency with clear service offerings.
  2. Content is well structured, multilingual support (Latvian, Russian, English).
  3. Strong presence of client testimonials with video evidence.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with active consent mechanism.
  5. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tracking tools.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain legitimacy cannot be fully verified.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with integration of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, and Google Maps API. It employs Google reCAPTCHA v2 Invisible for form protection and CookieScript for consent management. The site is mobile responsive with viewport adjustments and uses SVG icons and custom fonts. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The site includes multilingual support (Latvian, Russian, English) and well-structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities to improve security headers and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gim.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gim.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.