Skip to main content

Security report for gettranslation.io

BalticLinguaAlliance OÜ · Technology · Estonia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gettranslation.io is a professional multilingual translation and localization service provider operating under BalticLinguaAlliance OÜ, based in Estonia. The company offers a broad range of services including professional translation, enterprise solutions, developer tools with APIs, website localization, video subtitling, software localization, and official sworn translations. Their client base includes major global companies, positioning them as a reputable player in the technology-driven language services market. The website is built on a modern Angular framework with extensive use of analytics and marketing tools, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, though improvements can be made by enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security and privacy policies. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy, with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism and strong partner endorsements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gettranslation.io

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
67
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets B2B clients seeking multilingual solutions to expand into global markets. Their business model revolves around providing scalable translation and localization services supported by APIs and custom solutions. The presence of high-profile partners and client testimonials indicates strong market positioning and trust. The company is relatively new (founded 2022) but has quickly established a medium-sized operation with a broad service portfolio. Their ecosystem includes partnerships with payment processors and technology firms, enhancing their service delivery capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of DNSSEC and explicit security policies or incident response information suggests room for improvement. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface but appears managed with asynchronous loading and consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were detected in the provided data.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Review and optimize third-party scripts to minimize privacy impact and improve page load performance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
BalticLinguaAlliance OÜ
VAT number
EE102173754
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BalticLinguaAlliance OÜ
Description
We enable our clients to reach new markets globally by connecting with their audiences and providing the best possible customer experience — in any language.
Key services
Professional Translation, Enterprise Solutions, Developers' Tools (APIs), Website Localization, Google Ads Translation, Video Subtitling, Software Localization, Multilingual DTP, Official Translations, Custom Localization Solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 17, Google Tag Manager, Amplitude Analytics, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Trustpilot Widget, AdRoll, Stripe.js
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Amplitude, Google Analytics, TikTok Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Trustpilot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM), Amplitude Analytics, Trustpilot
Marketing tools
HubSpot (commented out), Trustpilot, Amplitude
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional multilingual translation and localization service provider
  2. Strong presence of major global partners and clients
  3. Modern, well-structured Angular SPA with good SEO and mobile optimization
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented
  5. No visible privacy policy or terms of service links on main page
  6. Multiple analytics and marketing tracking scripts present
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. WHOIS data consistent and domain status clientTransferProhibited enhances domain security
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a modern single-page application built with Angular 17, leveraging advanced analytics tools like Amplitude, TikTok Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, and Google Tag Manager. It uses asynchronous script loading for performance optimization and includes a comprehensive cookie consent banner for compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Hosting details are not explicit, but the domain is registered with a reputable registrar and protected against unauthorized transfers. The technical implementation supports a fast, user-friendly experience with strong SEO fundamentals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gettranslation.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gettranslation.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.