Skip to main content

Security report for getmoreproof.com

Proof Technologies, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Proof Technologies, Inc. operates a SaaS platform focused on increasing online sales and conversions through website personalization and social proof marketing. The company targets B2B businesses and boasts a strong market presence with over 25,000 customers. Their website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in relevant content, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The technical stack leverages modern tools such as Webflow CMS, Segment Analytics, and multiple marketing integrations, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reputable third-party services, though some improvements like DNSSEC and explicit security policies are recommended. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness with clear business information and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getmoreproof.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention getmoreproof.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for getmoreproof.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Proof is positioned as a key player in the website personalization and social proof marketing niche, leveraging a SaaS subscription model. Their customer base includes notable companies and they maintain partnerships with affiliate and marketing platforms. The business model focuses on conversion optimization for online businesses, primarily in the B2B sector. Growth indicators include a strong content marketing strategy, educational resources, and a presence in startup accelerators like Y Combinator. The company’s transparent contact information and legal policies support credibility and customer trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses email validation services to reduce fraudulent submissions. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended to enhance protection against DNS spoofing and clickjacking. No dedicated security policy or incident response contact is published, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface but these are from reputable providers. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Proof Technologies, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Proof Technologies, Inc.
Description
Proof lets you easily personalize your website for every visitor to increase conversions. It helps B2B companies increase leads, demos, and sales through social proof marketing and personalization.
Key services
Proof Pulse (social proof marketing), Personalization tools, Conversion optimization
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Segment Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, NeverBounce email validation, PartnerStack affiliate integration, User.com widget, Fixel analytics
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow hosting, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Email validation via NeverBounce
  • Use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment, Google Analytics (via GTM), User.com, Fixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, User.com, Fixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional SaaS business focused on website personalization and social proof.
  3. Strong branding and trust signals including Y Combinator affiliation and customer logos.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and terms policies present.
  5. Use of multiple modern marketing and analytics technologies.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info found.
  7. No phone number explicitly listed; contact primarily via email and forms.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS and hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring fast and reliable delivery. It integrates multiple modern marketing and analytics tools including Segment, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, reflecting a sophisticated tracking and data collection strategy. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. No major technical debt or performance issues were detected. Opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getmoreproof.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getmoreproof.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.