Skip to main content

Security report for gepro.cz

Gepro spol. s.r o · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gepro spol. s.r o is a Czech Republic-based company specializing in the development of software, data delivery, and comprehensive services including system integration in the GIS domain. The company targets GIS professionals and organizations requiring specialized GIS software and data solutions. Their business model focuses on software development, data services, and training, positioning them as an established regional player in the technology sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and social media presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Elementor, Smart Slider 3, and Yoast SEO, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and employs HTTPS with Google reCAPTCHA for form security. However, some security headers are missing, and explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not found, which could be improved for compliance and trust. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and anti-bot measures but lacks visible security policies and incident response information. The absence of WHOIS registrant data reduces domain trust assessment, though the website content and professional presentation support legitimacy. No critical vulnerabilities or adult content were detected, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and business credibility but should enhance privacy compliance and WHOIS transparency. Strategic recommendations include adding comprehensive privacy and security policies, implementing security headers, and improving accessibility features to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of gepro.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gepro.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gepro operates in the GIS technology sector, offering software and data services with system integration and training. Their market positioning is that of a medium-sized, regionally focused technology provider with a clear target audience of GIS professionals and institutions. The company leverages a WordPress-based digital platform with modern tools to engage customers and provide information. Their social media presence on YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram supports marketing and customer engagement. The lack of explicit privacy and terms pages suggests room for growth in compliance maturity. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The business model appears to be B2B focused, with revenue streams from software licenses, data sales, and consulting services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA implemented to protect forms from automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of visible security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency in security governance. The WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve accessibility features to ensure compliance with standards and enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gepro spol. s.r o
Description
Zabýváme se vývojem programového vybavení, dodávkami dat a komplexními službami včetně systémové integrace v oblastech GIS.
Key services
Software development, Data delivery, System integration, Training and consultation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Smart Slider 3, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Astra Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and plugins.
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  6. Contact information is not explicitly found on the homepage content provided.
  7. Social media presence is established on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  10. Website content is focused on GIS software and services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, supplemented by plugins such as Smart Slider 3 and Contact Form 7. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA for frontend interactivity and security. The site loads external fonts locally and uses optimized images for performance. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and mobile menu toggles. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details were not identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gepro.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gepro.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.