Skip to main content

Security report for geoly.net

GEOly.net · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GEOly.net is a specialized online directory focused on Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) tools, platforms, and resources. The website targets SEO professionals, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts seeking curated GEO/SEO tools and insights. It offers categorized listings, a blog with relevant articles, and a newsletter subscription to engage its audience. The business model centers on providing a comprehensive and up-to-date directory to facilitate discovery and usage of GEO-related services. Technically, GEOly.net is built on modern web technologies including Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The site integrates Google Adsense for monetization and uses multiple analytics services for user tracking and performance monitoring. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Contact information is limited to an email address in the footer, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, GEOly.net presents a professional and trustworthy platform with room for improvement in security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geoly.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche market position as a dedicated GEO/SEO tools directory, differentiating itself by focusing on generative engine optimization, a growing area in SEO technology. Its competitive advantage lies in curated listings, categorized tools, and educational blog content. Revenue streams likely include advertising via Google Adsense and potential premium listings or partnerships. The target customers are SEO professionals and marketers looking for specialized tools. The presence on multiple partner badge sites indicates an active partnership ecosystem. The business is relatively new, founded in 2025, and operates as a small-sized technology entity. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy compliance and security policies to build greater trust and comply with regulations.

Security posture

GEOly.net demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some common security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options indicates gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is basic, with no cookie consent mechanism, which may expose the site to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology directory but should be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and display a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Add explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GEOly.net
Description
Discover generative engine optimization service, platform, tools, websites, resource.
Key services
Listing of GEO/SEO tools, Blog with SEO and GEO insights, Newsletter subscription, Product submission
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Cloudflare DNS, Google Adsense, Vercel Analytics, Vercel Speed Insights
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS for DNS management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Umami Analytics, Vercel Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js), Umami Analytics
Marketing tools
Vercel Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche directory for Generative Engine Optimization tools and resources.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and categorized listings.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found, which may affect GDPR compliance.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and hosting on Vercel ensures good performance and mobile optimization.
  5. Security headers could be improved and DNSSEC enabled for better DNS security.
  6. Contact information limited to email in footer; no phone or physical address found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Advertising and analytics usage is moderate with Google Adsense and multiple analytics tools.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack, hosted on Vercel, which provides a scalable and performant infrastructure. The use of Cloudflare DNS enhances DNS reliability, though DNSSEC is not enabled. The site includes multiple analytics and advertising scripts, including Google Adsense, Google Analytics, Umami, and Vercel Analytics, indicating a mature approach to performance and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Meta tags and Open Graph data are well implemented for SEO and social sharing. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom-built solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with minor areas for security enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geoly.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geoly.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.