Skip to main content

Security report for geoapify.com

Geoapify GmbH · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Geoapify GmbH operates a comprehensive location platform offering APIs and services for maps, geocoding, routing, and geospatial analytics. The company targets businesses of all sizes, providing scalable and affordable solutions with a permissive license that supports commercial use and data storage. Their market position is strengthened by a feature-rich API suite and business-friendly terms, appealing to startups, SMBs, and enterprises alike. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as React and Gatsby, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though some security headers and explicit policies are not evident. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.geoapify.com is a notable concern, impacting domain legitimacy verification despite the professional presentation and clear contact information. Overall, Geoapify demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in transparency and security policy publication.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of geoapify.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geoapify.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention geoapify.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
382
Employees
0
Customers
382
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for geoapify.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Geoapify's business model revolves around providing location-based APIs and geospatial data services with a freemium pricing strategy and custom enterprise plans. Their competitive advantages include affordable pricing, permissive licensing, and a broad API portfolio covering mapping, geocoding, routing, and place data. The company serves a diverse customer base from startups to large enterprises, emphasizing scalability and ease of integration. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media presence but no explicit third-party business partners were identified. Growth indicators include active content updates, tutorials, and a developer playground. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing domain registration transparency and publishing formal security and incident response policies to bolster trust.

Security posture

Geoapify exhibits a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security governance. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Compliance with GDPR is implied through cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policy presence, but no dedicated data protection officer contact was identified. The overall security culture appears functional but could benefit from formalizing policies and improving communication channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is available or providing justification for privacy protection.
  5. Enhance trust signals by adding certifications or compliance badges relevant to data protection and security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Geoapify GmbH
Description
Geoapify offers a feature-rich location platform suitable for businesses of any size, providing maps, address and location search, route optimization, reachability analysis, geodata access, and more.
Key services
Maps API, Geocoding API, Routing API, Places API, Isolines API, Route Planner API, Map Matching API, Postcode API
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Tailwind CSS, SVG, JavaScript
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional and comprehensive location platform targeting businesses
  3. Clear contact options with company email and social media links
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML
  7. Modern tech stack with React and Gatsby
  8. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed
  9. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack with React and Gatsby, supported by Tailwind CSS for styling and SVG for graphics. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site demonstrates technical maturity with fast loading times and accessibility considerations, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize privacy and security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geoapify.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geoapify.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.