Skip to main content

Security report for galichat.com

GaliChat · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GaliChat is a technology company offering AI-powered chat agents designed to enhance business customer support and lead generation. Their platform enables businesses to create custom AI agents trained on their own knowledge bases, providing 24/7 support and faster response times. The website positions GaliChat as a versatile solution applicable across multiple industries, emphasizing ease of setup and customization. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with integration of popular libraries like Font Awesome and Google Fonts. It employs analytics tools including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for marketing and user behavior tracking. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form inputs, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance, though no active cookie consent mechanism is detected. The absence of WHOIS registration data introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy, though the professional site content and business presentation mitigate concerns. Overall, GaliChat presents a credible and professional online presence with strong business and technical foundations. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and domain registration clarity would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galichat.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GaliChat targets businesses seeking AI-driven customer engagement and support automation. Their SaaS model leverages AI agents trained on client data to reduce support costs and improve lead generation. The company markets itself across diverse sectors including healthcare, finance, education, retail, and more, indicating a broad market approach. Testimonials and affiliate programs suggest active customer engagement and partnership development. The business model focuses on ease of use, rapid deployment, and multilingual support, positioning GaliChat competitively in the AI chatbot market. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans with tiered features. The partnership with 'theresanaiforthat.com' indicates ecosystem integration and marketing collaboration.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No dedicated security policy or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file suggests limited formal vulnerability management. Privacy policies indicate GDPR awareness, but cookie consent mechanisms are not implemented, which may pose compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with room for improvement in headers, policies, and transparency to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and security policies to improve transparency and customer trust.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to ensure full GDPR compliance regarding user tracking.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and remediation of security issues.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to strengthen legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GaliChat
Description
Power your business growth with AI Agents that deliver flawless customer experiences and lead generation. Make your customers happy while saving money.
Key services
Custom AI Agents, Customer support automation, Lead generation, Knowledge base training, Multi-language support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Sibforms
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form inputs with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Sibforms newsletter
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Professional design and clear business focus on AI-powered customer support.
  3. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  4. Contact primarily via email and web forms.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some concerns about domain registration transparency.
  7. Multiple languages supported and industry use cases well documented.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. Privacy and cookie policies present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering and static export capabilities, ensuring fast load times and SEO friendliness. It uses popular front-end libraries and fonts, and integrates third-party analytics and marketing tools effectively. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely cloud-based given the technology stack. Performance is fast with minimal blocking scripts. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require regular security audits to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galichat.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galichat.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.