Skip to main content

Security report for galeos.eu

GALEOS a. s. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GALEOS a. s. operates as a distributor of Progress Software technologies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, providing software distribution, support, and professional services to application partners and direct customers. The company positions itself as a key technology intermediary for enterprise application development and integration, leveraging Progress Software's products such as OpenEdge and DataRPM. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and includes modern web technologies and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital presence. However, explicit contact information and privacy policy details are limited in the accessible content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but could be improved with additional security headers and clearer privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the domain appears legitimate and consistent with the business claims, though WHOIS data is privacy-protected as per EURid policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, Cloudflare, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galeos.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention galeos.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for galeos.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GALEOS a. s. targets enterprise software developers and businesses in the Czech and Slovak markets, focusing on distributing and supporting Progress Software products. The business model centers on technology distribution and value-added services, including technical support and professional consulting. The company maintains a professional online presence with event announcements and partner engagement, suggesting active market participation. The use of multiple analytics and retargeting services indicates a focus on marketing and customer engagement. The absence of detailed contact and compliance information online may limit transparency but is not uncommon for distributors. No suspicious or fraudulent indicators were found.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting baseline security and privacy awareness. Multiple third-party scripts are used, including Google Analytics and Piwik/Matomo, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. The lack of visible contact information for security incidents or a vulnerability disclosure policy suggests limited incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were identified. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy page outlining GDPR compliance, data retention, and user rights to improve transparency and legal compliance.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses, to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GALEOS a. s.
Description
Galeos zprostředkovává špičkové technologie Progressu pro vývoj, provoz a integraci podnikových aplikací svým aplikačním partnerům a přímým zákazníkům, poskytuje podporu a profesionální služby.
Key services
distribution of Progress Software technologies, support, professional services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Piwik/Matomo, Scriptaculous, Prototype.js, Select2, jQuery (implied by Scriptaculous dependency), Lottie animations
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Piwik/Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Seznam Retargeting
Tracking pixels
Piwik/Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Czech language with English and Polish language options
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML snippet
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content
  5. Use of multiple analytics and retargeting scripts
  6. No signs of malware or phishing
  7. WHOIS data is not disclosed publicly by EURid for .eu domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a CMS named Marwel and incorporates JavaScript libraries such as Prototype.js and Scriptaculous, along with modern tools like Lottie for animations and Select2 for enhanced UI elements. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Piwik/Matomo, with retargeting through Google Ads and Seznam Retargeting. The site is multilingual, supporting Czech, English, and Polish. Performance appears moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and detailed privacy documentation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could be modernized with newer frameworks and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galeos.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galeos.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.