Skip to main content

Security report for g10894638425.co

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at g10894638425.co presents minimal content, consisting solely of the text 'Geo Targetly - Europe-West-6-Node'. There is no indication of a business, services, or any user-facing functionality. The domain's WHOIS data is privacy protected, providing no transparency about ownership or registration details. The lack of content and metadata suggests this site may serve as a placeholder or technical node indicator rather than a commercial or informational website. Technically, the site lacks any detectable technologies, scripts, or frameworks. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, which indicates a poor security posture. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, or contact information further reduces the site's compliance and trustworthiness. From a security perspective, the site does not exhibit any active protections or best practices. The privacy-protected WHOIS data combined with minimal content raises concerns about legitimacy and transparency. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected, but the overall security posture is weak due to missing fundamental protections. Overall, the site scores very low on content quality, technical implementation, security, privacy compliance, and business credibility. It is recommended to implement HTTPS, add clear business and contact information, and provide privacy and cookie policies to improve trust and compliance. Without these improvements, the site remains a low-trust placeholder with limited utility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of g10894638425.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching g10894638425.co

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Given the absence of business-related content or metadata, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be used for technical or infrastructure purposes rather than commercial activity. There are no indications of market positioning, revenue streams, or customer segments. The lack of partnerships or related domains further supports the conclusion that this is not an active business website.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is minimal to non-existent. There is no evidence of HTTPS, security headers, or secure coding practices. The WHOIS privacy protection obscures ownership details, which can be a red flag for trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The site does not comply with GDPR or other privacy regulations due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is vulnerable to interception and lacks basic security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.
  2. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  3. Publish clear contact information including email and phone to improve credibility.
  4. Include security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance security.
  5. Develop meaningful website content describing business services or purpose to improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website content is minimal and only contains the text 'Geo Targetly - Europe-West-6-Node'. No business description or services are provided.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is extremely minimal and does not provide any business or contact information.
  2. No metadata, forms, scripts, or external links are present in the HTML content.
  3. No security headers or HTTPS information provided; security posture cannot be verified.
  4. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting transparency about ownership.
  5. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  6. No contact information or social media links detected.
  7. No advertising or analytics technologies detected.
  8. Website appears to be a placeholder or node indicator rather than a functional business site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website consists of a minimal HTML page with no metadata, scripts, or external resources. No CMS or frameworks are detected. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but lacks optimization for SEO or accessibility. The absence of mobile optimization and accessibility features limits usability. The technical debt is high due to missing fundamental web standards and security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100 −5Medium35 findingsView report
  2. 60/100Medium33 findingsView report
  3. 60/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with g10894638425.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review g10894638425.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.