Skip to main content

Security report for g-2.eu

SIA G-2 · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

G-2 is a Latvia-based full stack development agency specializing in software development, design, integrations, and automation services tailored to business needs. With 8 years of experience and a team of 23 specialists, they target businesses seeking IT and digital transformation solutions. Their website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and includes clear contact information and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Bootstrap framework, and Osano for consent management, indicating a contemporary tech stack with moderate performance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers and explicit policies are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed via cookie consent and a privacy policy page. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with no signs of malicious or suspicious activity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching g-2.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small-sized technology service provider focused on custom IT solutions including software development, design, and automation. Their market positioning is that of a specialized agency with a stable team and client portfolio, as evidenced by their showcased projects. The business model is service-oriented, targeting SMEs and enterprises needing digital transformation. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts and ongoing service agreements. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem with clients but no explicit subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth indicators include longevity since 2011 and a diverse service offering. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality and client collaboration to differentiate in a competitive market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented via Osano CMP. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, nor a vulnerability disclosure mechanism like security.txt. GDPR compliance is indicated by the privacy and cookie policies. The site lacks advanced security features and formalized incident response readiness, which could be improved to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to harden site security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “G-2”
Registration number
40103854723
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA G-2
Description
A full stack development agency providing custom software development, design, integrations, and automation services tailored to business needs.
Key services
Software Development, Design, Integrations, Automation, Apps Development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Slick Slider, Google Fonts, Osano Consent Management
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), Osano CMP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Osano Consent Management Platform
Marketing tools
Osano CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Clear cookie consent mechanism implemented
  3. Contact information is complete and verifiable
  4. No visible security policy or incident response info on site
  5. No terms of service page found
  6. No analytics scripts detected beyond consent management
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with Bootstrap framework and Osano consent management. It loads Google Fonts asynchronously and uses slick slider for portfolio display. The site is mobile-optimized and uses lazy loading for videos and images, improving performance. Hosting details are limited but domain registrar is Key-Systems GmbH. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No CMS detected, likely a custom or static site. Technical risks include missing security headers and limited accessibility features. Overall, the infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in security and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with g-2.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review g-2.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.