Skip to main content

Security report for fr.weber

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in DNS health, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.fr.weber is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) challenge page, which blocks direct access to the site's content. This prevents extraction of meaningful business, contact, or policy information. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and a cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust, indicating some level of privacy compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed request or privacy protection, limiting domain trust assessment. The presence of multiple related domains linked to the Saint-Gobain group suggests the site is part of a larger corporate ecosystem. However, without access to the actual site content, a full evaluation of business operations, security posture, and compliance cannot be performed.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: mx.fr.weber.cust.b.hostedemail.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fr.weber

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the WAF challenge, no direct business information, market positioning, or service details are accessible. The analytics mapping references multiple domains associated with Saint-Gobain, a known multinational corporation in construction materials, indicating that www.fr.weber is likely a regional or subsidiary site within this group. The lack of accessible contact or policy information limits insights into customer engagement or operational transparency.

Security posture

The site is protected by Cloudflare's WAF with Turnstile captcha, which is a strong security measure against automated attacks and bots. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the provided data. The absence of accessible content and WHOIS data restricts assessment of incident response readiness or vulnerability disclosure practices. The use of Google Tag Manager is noted, but no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data can be confirmed due to content blocking.

Recommendations

  1. Complete or bypass the Cloudflare WAF challenge to enable full site content analysis.
  2. Ensure WHOIS data is publicly accessible or provide verified registrant information for transparency.
  3. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without security challenges.
  5. Establish and disclose vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha and browser checking message. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a Cloudflare WAF challenge page.
  2. No meaningful content or metadata is accessible for analysis.
  3. No contact information, privacy policy, or terms of service found in accessible content.
  4. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is present via OneTrust script.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request or privacy protection.
  7. Multiple related domains from Saint-Gobain group detected in analytics mapping.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The site employs Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating use of modern marketing and privacy tools. The presence of Cloudflare WAF and Turnstile captcha suggests a robust security infrastructure to mitigate automated threats. However, the site content is not accessible for performance, SEO, or accessibility evaluation. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The technical implementation appears to prioritize security but at the cost of accessibility for automated analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fr.weber. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fr.weber.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.