Skip to main content

Security report for foxmedia.cz

Fox Media Czech Republic s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fox Media Czech Republic s.r.o. is a Prague-based software development company specializing in mobile applications, backend systems, dashboards, and control panels. Their expertise includes modern technologies such as Rust, React.js, Node.js, and Docker, targeting ambitious clients seeking reliable and high-quality software solutions. The company positions itself as a niche player with a focus on performance-critical and multi-platform software development. The website presents a professional image with clear service offerings and client logos, indicating established partnerships and a credible market presence. Technically, the website is built using the Framer framework, leveraging modern web technologies and optimized for mobile devices. The tech stack is comprehensive and modern, including advanced tools for backend and frontend development. However, the site lacks explicit CMS usage and detailed hosting information. Performance and SEO are well addressed, but accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, which raises compliance concerns, especially regarding GDPR. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant trust concern, as it prevents verification of domain ownership and age. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate data exposure risks. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but requires improvements in compliance documentation, security hardening, and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foxmedia.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fox Media operates in the technology sector, focusing on software development services with a specialization in Rust and React technologies. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting startups and businesses needing fast, reliable backend and mobile solutions. The presence of client logos from diverse sectors suggests a growing partnership ecosystem. The company appears small but agile, with a clear technical focus and a niche market position. Revenue streams likely derive from custom software projects and consulting. The website content and technology stack indicate a modern digital maturity level, though compliance and security documentation lag behind industry best practices.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security events. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data practices.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fox Media Czech Republic s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ29144922
Registration number
29144922
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fox Media Czech Republic s.r.o.
Description
Fox Media Czech Republic is Prague based software development team. We are here to support ambitious people, who needs reliable and high quality software solution.
Key services
Dashboards and control panels, Fast and reliable backends, Multi-platform mobile applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Rust, JavaScript, React.js, Node.js, Docker, Capacitor, Grafana, Loki, Solid.js, Object databases, Relation databases
Frameworks
Framer (site generator/framework)
Platforms
Web, Mobile (multi-platform via Capacitor)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
framer.com events script
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company registration details.
  5. Technology stack is modern and well presented.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  7. No forms detected on the site; no data collection forms present.
  8. External links mostly to partner or client domains.
  9. No social media links found in the content.
  10. No analytics beyond Framer event script detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer framework, which provides a modern and responsive design. The tech stack includes Rust for backend development, React.js and Solid.js for frontend interfaces, and Capacitor for cross-platform mobile applications. Docker is used for containerization, indicating a modern DevOps approach. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Accessibility is basic, and no advanced performance monitoring tools are detected. The technical implementation is solid but could be improved with enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foxmedia.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foxmedia.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.