Skip to main content

Security report for fortinet.com

Fortinet · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fortinet is a globally recognized leader in cybersecurity solutions and services, delivering comprehensive protection across the digital attack surface including devices, data, and applications. The company targets enterprises and IT professionals with a broad portfolio of network security products and a Security Fabric platform. The website reflects Fortinet's market position with professional branding, clear messaging, and extensive social media presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Adobe Launch for tag management, New Relic for performance monitoring, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and SEO, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses security monitoring tools, and implements privacy and cookie policies compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers and dedicated security or incident response pages are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in transparency and security communication. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but likely due to privacy or registry policies rather than malicious intent. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and providing clearer incident response contacts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fortinet.com

This scan found 9 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fortinet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
124,271
Employees
133
Customers
123,705
Third parties
433
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-14 · 2,288 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fortinet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –catalog.fortinet.com2026-06-14
  • –customersso1.fortinet.com2026-06-08
  • –smtp.fortinet.com2026-05-28
  • –store.fortinet.com2026-05-28
  • –fac.corp.fortinet.com2026-05-27

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fortinet operates in the technology sector as an essential entity providing cybersecurity solutions globally. Its business model focuses on delivering integrated security products and services to enterprises, securing network infrastructure and digital assets. The company maintains a strong brand presence and trust indicators such as comprehensive privacy policies and verified contact information. Fortinet's market positioning as a global leader is supported by its extensive service offerings and consistent branding. The website's content and structure cater to IT professionals and enterprise customers, reflecting a B2B focus. The lack of visible subsidiaries or partner domains on the website suggests a centralized digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security monitoring tools like New Relic, and implementation of cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options, and lack of a dedicated security policy or incident response page, indicate areas for enhancement. The WHOIS data unavailability is a minor concern but does not significantly impact the trustworthiness given the website's professional presentation. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could benefit from improved transparency and additional security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly publish security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
  2. Create and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security team to comply with data protection regulations and improve communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fortinet
Description
Fortinet delivers cybersecurity everywhere you need it. We secure the entire digital attack surface from devices, data, and apps and from data center to home office.
Key services
Network Security, Security Fabric Platform, Cybersecurity Solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, New Relic Browser Agent, Adobe Launch (Adobe DTM), OneTrust Cookie Consent, Helix RUM, jQuery
Frameworks
Adobe DTM
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic Browser, Adobe Launch
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic, Adobe DTM
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet; contact info provided via phone and social media.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, but website content and branding strongly indicate legitimacy.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram confirmed via structured data.
  8. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical infrastructure leveraging Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Adobe Launch for tag management, and New Relic for performance and error monitoring. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and asynchronous loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and provides clear business information to search engines. No significant technical debt or performance bottlenecks were identified in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fortinet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fortinet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.