Skip to main content

Security report for forms.gle

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed page is an error message indicating an invalid dynamic link related to Google's Firebase Dynamic Links service. It serves as a notification to developers that the requested URL is not a valid or complete dynamic link. The page content is minimal, containing no business information, privacy policies, or contact details. The domain forms.gle is owned by Google LLC, consistent with the Firebase service ownership. The technical infrastructure is based on Firebase hosting with basic HTML and Google Fonts usage. Security posture is minimal on this page due to lack of security headers and policies, but the domain ownership by Google provides inherent trust. Overall, the page is not blocked by any WAF or security challenge but is an error page with limited content, resulting in a low AI score and limited compliance or business credibility indicators.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of forms.gle. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching forms.gle

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
45
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain forms.gle is a Google-owned domain used for Firebase Dynamic Links, a service targeting developers who create deep links for mobile and web applications. The business model is service-oriented, providing link management and redirection capabilities. The market position is strong as part of Google's cloud services ecosystem. No direct revenue streams or customer-facing business information are present on this error page. The partnership ecosystem includes Firebase and Google Cloud Platform. The page analyzed is not designed for end-user engagement but for developer error notification.

Security posture

The security maturity of this specific page is low due to the absence of security headers, privacy policies, or incident response information. However, the domain ownership by Google and hosting on Firebase imply a robust underlying security infrastructure. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the page content. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations cannot be assessed from this page alone. Incident response and security policies are not disclosed here. The page should improve by adding security headers and user guidance for error handling.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and link to comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on all user-facing pages.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact or support information for developers encountering errors.
  4. Enhance the error page with user-friendly guidance and links to documentation.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor Firebase Dynamic Links configuration to prevent invalid link errors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The page is an error message indicating an invalid dynamic link related to Firebase Dynamic Links service.
Key services
Firebase Dynamic Links service
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Firebase, Google Fonts (Roboto), HTML5
Platforms
Firebase
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. The page is an error message indicating an invalid dynamic link for Firebase Dynamic Links service.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present on this page.
  3. No contact information or business details are provided on this error page.
  4. The page contains minimal content and no forms or scripts beyond basic HTML.
  5. Only one external link to firebase.google.com is present.
  6. No security headers or advanced security features detected in the HTML content.
  7. The domain is owned by Google LLC with privacy protection, consistent with the service.
  8. No advertising or analytics scripts detected on this page.
  9. The page is not blocked by WAF or security challenge but is an error page with minimal content.
Technical notes

Notes

The page is a simple HTML error page served by Firebase hosting, using Google Fonts for typography. There are no scripts or advanced frameworks detected. The hosting provider is Google Firebase, ensuring reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tag present. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags and content. Accessibility is basic with readable font and layout but no ARIA or semantic enhancements. Technical risks are low but the page lacks security headers and policies that could improve trust and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 −1Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 69/100 +1Medium28 findingsView report
  3. 68/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with forms.gle. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review forms.gle.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.