Skip to main content

Security report for footshop.eu

Footshop a.s. · E-commerce · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Footshop a.s. operates a large-scale European e-commerce platform specializing in sneakers, clothing, and accessories from major brands such as adidas, Nike, and Converse. The company targets sneaker enthusiasts and fashion consumers across multiple European countries with localized websites and a loyalty program. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure leveraging modern technologies including Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Typekit fonts, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is strong with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible vulnerabilities, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, supporting a high level of business credibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of footshop.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching footshop.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention footshop.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3,913
Employees
0
Customers
3,880
Third parties
33
Weak passwords
11%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for footshop.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Footshop holds a strong market position as a leading sneaker and streetwear retailer in Europe, supported by a broad product catalog and multi-country presence. The business model focuses on direct online retail with additional physical stores in key cities. The company leverages partnerships with major brands and maintains active social media channels to engage customers. Revenue streams primarily derive from product sales and loyalty program incentives. The platform's technical sophistication and marketing integrations indicate a focus on growth and customer retention. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance security transparency and incident response readiness to further strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS encryption, cookie consent compliance, and absence of exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. The use of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Security headers are partially implemented or not explicitly visible, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and communication channels to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Audit and enforce comprehensive security headers including X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly review third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve inclusivity and meet regulatory standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Footshop a.s.
Description
The biggest selection of sneakers by brands such as adidas, Converse, Nike, Vans and more in stock! Shop online for great prices at Footshop!
Key services
Online sneaker sales, Clothing and accessories sales, Multi-country localized e-commerce, Footshop Club loyalty program
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Typekit Fonts, Webpack, React (implied by hypernova data attributes), Service Workers
Frameworks
Bootstrap (default-bootstrap theme)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Service worker unregister script to prevent stale cache

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  3. Clear contact information with company email and phone
  4. Strong social media presence across major platforms
  5. Modern tech stack with analytics and marketing integrations
  6. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting registrant transparency
  8. Good SEO and mobile optimization observed
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts, service workers for caching, and Typekit for typography. The platform appears to be built on a Bootstrap-based theme with React components indicated by hypernova data attributes. Performance is moderate with optimizations such as preconnect and preload hints. Mobile optimization is good, supporting a responsive design. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party services and the need for continuous security monitoring. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with footshop.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review footshop.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.