Skip to main content

Security report for footer.design

Footer · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Footer is a niche online platform providing a curated gallery of website footer designs aimed at web designers and digital creatives seeking inspiration. The site positions itself uniquely as the only footer gallery on earth, offering sorting by type and style to enhance user experience. The business model revolves around content curation and community submissions, supported by a small team. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, jQuery, and third-party scripts like Humblytics for analytics. The site is hosted on Webflow's platform, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. No WHOIS data is available, indicating privacy protection for domain registration, which is reasonable for this business type. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-designed but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching footer.design

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Footer operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting the web design community with a specialized content offering. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique focus on footer designs, a niche not commonly served by other design galleries. The platform likely generates value through community engagement and possibly partnerships, such as with NOOON studio, which is credited for site development. The absence of direct contact information and business registration details suggests a small, possibly bootstrapped operation. Growth potential exists through expanding content offerings and improving compliance and trust signals. The partnership ecosystem includes design studios and analytics providers, supporting its operational needs.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks several security best practices such as security headers (CSP, HSTS), privacy and cookie policies, and incident response contact information. The use of third-party analytics without a visible consent mechanism raises privacy compliance concerns, especially under GDPR. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are present. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but is common for small businesses protecting privacy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a content site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email address to facilitate incident response.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Footer
Description
Footer is a curated gallery of the top website footer inspiration on earth. Find the footers you need and sort by type and style.
Key services
Curated footer design gallery, Footer style/type sorting, Submission platform for footer designs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Inter), jQuery 3.5.1, Finsweet Attributes CMS Load, Humblytics analytics
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Humblytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Humblytics
Marketing tools
Humblytics analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a curated gallery focused exclusively on website footer designs.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or registrar data unavailability.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and is hosted on Webflow.
  6. Includes social media links to Twitter and LinkedIn.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML content; HTTPS is used.
  8. Includes third-party analytics (Humblytics) without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  9. No forms detected that collect user data except submission page link (form not present in analyzed HTML).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, which provides a modern, responsive, and performant infrastructure. It uses Google Fonts for typography and jQuery for JavaScript functionality. The site loads additional scripts asynchronously, including Finsweet CMS attributes and Humblytics analytics, indicating a focus on performance and user tracking. Hosting on Webflow ensures reliable uptime and fast content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features such as focus-visible outlines and text rendering optimizations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. However, the lack of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas that should be addressed to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100 +1Medium33 findingsView report
  2. 65/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with footer.design. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review footer.design.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.