Skip to main content

Security report for foodunion.lv

Food Union Latvia · Manufacturing · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Food Union Latvia is a well-established global food manufacturing group with a strong presence in Latvia, focusing on dairy and other food products. Their website reflects a professional brand with clear messaging about their business approach and consumer focus. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and provides comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. Technically, the website uses modern frameworks like React and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent blocking, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in security transparency and accessibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of foodunion.lv. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foodunion.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a leader in the dairy sector since 1909, targeting consumers in Latvia and international markets. Their business model centers on manufacturing and brand development, leveraging strong local brands and innovation. The website supports this with clear navigation, social media integration, and contact information. The presence of a parent domain (foodunion.com) indicates a broader corporate structure. No affiliate or suspicious domains were detected, reinforcing legitimacy. The company appears to have a mature digital presence with moderate performance and good SEO practices.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which is a gap in transparency. No security headers were detected in the provided data, suggesting potential improvements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, reflecting good baseline practices but lacking advanced security disclosures and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and enhance user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Food Union Latvia
Description
Food Union is a global food producer group creating delicious products popular in various countries. They develop strong local brands in Latvia focusing on consumer wellbeing.
Key services
Food product manufacturing, Brand management, Consumer product development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with blocking mode
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and cookie consent tools
  2. Clear cookie consent with detailed cookie categories and descriptions
  3. Contact information includes physical address and phone number with clear labeling
  4. Social media presence on major platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube)
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. No terms of service page detected
  7. Good privacy and cookie policy compliance with GDPR indicators
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React with chunked JavaScript files, indicating a modern single-page application architecture. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and marketing. Cookiebot is used for GDPR-compliant cookie consent with blocking mode enabled. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses SVG logos and images optimized for various screen sizes. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS solution. Mobile optimization and SEO are good, but accessibility can be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foodunion.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foodunion.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.