Skip to main content

Security report for foodunion.lv

Food Union Latvia · Manufacturing · Latvia

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Food Union Latvia is a well-established food manufacturing company specializing in dairy products with a strong market presence in Latvia since 1909. The company focuses on creating beloved local brands and emphasizes consumer well-being. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting general consumers in Latvia and neighboring regions. The business model centers on manufacturing and marketing food products, supported by a clear digital presence including social media and multilingual support via a partner international site. Technically, the website is built using modern technologies such as React and integrates Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is served over HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR requirements. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO practices are adequately implemented. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent for privacy. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, and no public security policy or incident response contacts are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, showing a long domain age and no privacy protection, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with good privacy compliance and a solid business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foodunion.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Food Union Latvia holds a leading position in the dairy manufacturing sector in Latvia, with a history dating back to 1909. The company leverages deep market knowledge and innovation to maintain strong local brands. Their business model is focused on manufacturing and distributing dairy products, targeting consumers who value quality and tradition. The company maintains a professional digital presence with multilingual support and active social media channels, indicating a mature marketing strategy. Partnerships and related domains suggest a broader international footprint under the Food Union Group umbrella. The company appears to have stable growth indicators and a clear focus on consumer satisfaction and sustainability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No incident response or security contact information is publicly available, which could hinder timely reporting and handling of security issues. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Food Union Latvia
Description
Food Union is a global food manufacturing group creating beloved local brands in Latvia and other countries, focusing on dairy products and consumer well-being.
Key services
Production of dairy products, Brand management, Consumer goods distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript frameworks
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with physical address and phone
  4. Social media presence on major platforms is linked
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy found
  6. No email addresses explicitly found in HTML content
  7. No forms for contact or data collection detected in the HTML snippet
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with chunked JavaScript assets for performance optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy management. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and external scripts are asynchronously loaded to improve page load times. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a headless CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debt or legacy technology was observed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foodunion.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foodunion.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.