Skip to main content

Security report for fomo.com

Fomo · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fomo operates as a social proof marketing platform, positioning itself as a pioneer in this niche with a SaaS business model targeting marketers and businesses seeking to leverage social proof to increase conversions. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content quality, supporting a medium-sized technology company founded in 1996. The technical infrastructure includes modern analytics and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Cloudflare DNS, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain protections in place, though improvements are recommended such as enabling DNSSEC and publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. The extensive use of tracking and marketing scripts suggests a high level of user data collection, but no explicit privacy compliance mechanisms were found in the provided content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fomo.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fomo's market positioning as the world's first social proof marketing platform gives it a competitive advantage in the marketing technology sector. Its business model relies on SaaS subscriptions with integrations to over 106 services, indicating a broad ecosystem and potential for scalable revenue streams. The target audience includes digital marketers and businesses aiming to boost sales through social proof. The company leverages multiple advertising and analytics platforms to optimize marketing efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies on the main page may limit direct customer engagement and compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited statuses. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers were detected in the provided content, and there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The security score reflects these strengths and gaps, recommending improvements in DNS security, security headers, and transparency around security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Implement and document a security policy including incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  5. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fomo
Description
Fomo is the world's first social proof marketing platform.
Key services
Social proof marketing platform, Integrations with 106+ services, Marketing automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Google Optimize, Cloudflare DNS, New Relic Browser Agent, Vimeo Player API, AdRoll
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, FullStory, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, Google Optimize
Marketing tools
AdRoll, Google Optimize
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts are used extensively.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but does not have DNSSEC enabled.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Website content is professional and focused on social proof marketing platform.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with multiple analytics and marketing tools integrated via asynchronous JavaScript, including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, and Google Optimize. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized and loads efficiently. No CMS or specific web framework was detected from the HTML content. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and SEO improvements. The absence of structured data like JSON-LD limits rich search results potential.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fomo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fomo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.