Skip to main content

Security report for fluux.io

ProcessOne · Technology · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fluux is a realtime messaging platform offering Software as a Service (SaaS) built on industry standards such as XMPP and MQTT. Owned and operated by ProcessOne, a French technology company founded in 2016, Fluux targets developers and businesses requiring scalable, robust realtime communication infrastructure. The platform supports a variety of use cases including dashboard analytics, connected devices, data processing, user chat, bots, and machine learning integration. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image aligned with its parent company, ProcessOne, and highlights trusted clients and open source technology foundations. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Analytics with fingerprinting, and responsive design, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is good with TLS 1.3 and AES256 encryption claims, but lacks explicit published security policies and security headers. Privacy compliance is limited by absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, Fluux demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fluux.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fluux operates in the technology sector providing realtime messaging infrastructure as a service. Its competitive advantage lies in supporting open standards (XMPP and MQTT), scalability from first user to billions, and flexible APIs. The business model is SaaS with flexible pricing and no long-term commitments, appealing to a broad developer and enterprise audience. The company leverages its parent ProcessOne's expertise and open source ejabberd technology. The client portfolio includes recognizable brands, enhancing market credibility. Growth indicators include integration with modern technologies like machine learning and IoT. The partnership ecosystem is centered around ProcessOne, with no other subsidiaries or partners explicitly identified. Strategic observations suggest Fluux is positioned as a reliable, expert-driven realtime platform with a focus on security and compliance, though it could benefit from enhanced transparency and direct contact options.

Security posture

Fluux exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. The website is served over HTTPS with modern TLS encryption and claims data encryption at rest. The domain is protected with clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risk of unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP) and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) represents potential areas of improvement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found, limiting transparency. The use of Google Analytics with fingerprinting indicates moderate user tracking, which may have privacy implications. Overall, Fluux demonstrates awareness of security best practices but should enhance documentation and technical controls to improve trust and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Add security HTTP headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ProcessOne
Description
Realtime XMPP and MQTT Software and Infrastructure as a Service.
Key services
Realtime messaging platform, XMPP and MQTT protocol support, Dashboard analytics, Connected devices integration, Data processing, User chat, Bots, Machine learning integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
XMPP, MQTT, ejabberd, Google Analytics, jQuery, Slick slider
Platforms
AWS (implied by data location options)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • TLS 1.3 and AES256 encryption mentioned
  • Data encryption at rest
  • EU GDPR compliance claimed
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp (newsletter subscription)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional SaaS platform for realtime messaging using XMPP and MQTT
  2. Strong branding linkage to ProcessOne company
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page or footer
  4. Contact available only via contact form, no direct emails or phone numbers visible
  5. Security claims made but no detailed policies published
  6. Modern UI with responsive design and interactive elements
  7. Google Analytics used with fingerprinting for user tracking
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
  9. WHOIS data consistent and domain not privacy protected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including ejabberd for realtime messaging, Google Analytics with fingerprinting for analytics, and jQuery with Slick slider for UI components. Hosting is likely on AWS as implied by data location options, with domain registration via Gandi SAS. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and professional design. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and explicit privacy mechanisms indicates areas for modernization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fluux.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fluux.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.