Skip to main content

Security report for flinch77.com

Digital Sparks B.V. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Digital Sparks B.V. is a specialized Webflow development and design agency that has completed over 250 projects, serving a global clientele including notable brands such as Walmart, Tommy Hilfiger, and Michael Kors. The company positions itself as a top 10 certified Webflow partner worldwide, offering comprehensive services including complete website builds, custom development, and growth optimization. Their business model focuses on delivering scalable, high-performance websites tailored to maximize brand visibility and engagement. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and SVG graphics for a visually appealing and responsive user experience. The site is hosted on Webflow's infrastructure and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance and mobile optimization are excellent, with good SEO and accessibility practices observed. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are present. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, although the professional presentation and client testimonials support credibility. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the website demonstrates strong business credibility and technical maturity but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy, security policies, and domain registration information to improve trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flinch77.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Digital Sparks operates in the technology sector as a Webflow-focused agency, targeting brands and agencies seeking bespoke web design and development services. Their competitive advantage lies in their certified partner status with Webflow, extensive project portfolio, and demonstrated revenue impact for clients. The company leverages a service-based business model, generating revenue through project engagements and ongoing development support. Their client base includes high-profile brands, indicating strong market positioning and trust. The partnership ecosystem includes Webflow and various technology providers, although no explicit business partners or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators include over 250 successful projects and $20M+ generated revenue for clients, reflecting a healthy operational scale and market demand.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive information. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the company to regulatory risks under GDPR and similar frameworks. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness and complicates verification of ownership. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are detected, the security posture would benefit from enhanced policy disclosures, security header implementation, and domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and build user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and incident management.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Digital Sparks B.V.
Description
Bespoke web design & Webflow development that maximize brand visibility and engagement. Trusted by 250+ brands worldwide.
Key services
Complete Websites, Development, Growth
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, JavaScript, SVG, Google Tag Manager, Finsweet Attributes
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Optibase
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional Webflow development and design agency
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page
  4. Contact available via contact form only, no direct emails or phone numbers found
  5. Strong client testimonials and portfolio presence
  6. Modern tech stack with Webflow CMS and JavaScript
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies including JavaScript, SVG graphics, and third-party libraries such as Finsweet Attributes for enhanced UI components. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site demonstrates excellent mobile responsiveness, accessibility features, and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of explicit security headers and privacy policy pages indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and performant but requires improvements in security and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flinch77.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flinch77.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.