Skip to main content

Security report for fleep.bot

Fleep Bot · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fleep Bot is a technology company specializing in Telegram-based bot construction and delayed posting services aimed at businesses seeking to automate sales, content management, and customer support within Telegram. The company operates a SaaS subscription model with tiered pricing plans targeting small to medium-sized enterprises leveraging Telegram for marketing and communication. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service descriptions, user testimonials, and an affiliate program, positioning itself as a niche player in the Telegram automation market. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and integrates third-party analytics via Yandex Metrika and marketing tools like Sales Ninja. The site is mobile-optimized with good user experience and moderate performance. However, accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, and no major CMS or hosting provider details are evident. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and published security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to email and Telegram support bots, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy with moderate risk. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response transparency would enhance its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fleep.bot

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fleep Bot operates in the technology sector, focusing on Telegram bot services for business automation. Its competitive advantage lies in rapid bot creation, delayed posting, and a marketplace for Telegram projects. The subscription-based business model offers multiple pricing tiers catering to different business sizes and needs. The target customers are businesses and marketers using Telegram as a communication channel. Growth indicators include a large number of channels and bots created, as well as a significant audience reach. The company maintains an affiliate program to expand its market presence. Strategic partnerships appear limited to internal blog and Telegram channels. The business is relatively young, founded in 2020, with consistent domain registration and no privacy protection, indicating transparency.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency in incident response. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but no evident malicious behavior. Incident response contact channels are not published. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small SaaS provider but could be improved to meet higher compliance standards and user trust expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response procedures.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance.
  4. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to improve security posture.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations for broader reach and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fleep Bot
Description
Fleep Bot offers a Telegram-based bot constructor and delayed posting service for businesses to automate sales, manage channels and chats, and optimize content creation and customer support.
Key services
Bot constructor for business, Delayed posting and channel management, Project exchange for buying and selling Telegram projects, Customer support automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Swiper.js, Yandex Metrika, Sales Ninja
Platforms
Telegram Bot Platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Sales Ninja
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-oriented with clear service offerings and pricing.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, though privacy policy is present.
  4. Security headers are not visible in the HTML; recommend adding for improved security posture.
  5. Multiple external scripts used for analytics and marketing purposes.
  6. Contact information is limited to email and Telegram support bot; no phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  7. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the website.
  8. Good mobile optimization and user experience.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS or framework with modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and integrates third-party services like Yandex Metrika for analytics and Sales Ninja for marketing automation. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and moderate performance. No major CMS or hosting provider information is disclosed. The technical stack is adequate for the service offered but lacks advanced accessibility and SEO features. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. The site could benefit from improved security headers and enhanced privacy controls to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fleep.bot. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fleep.bot.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.