Skip to main content

Security report for flave.at

Flave - premium guest and event solution · Technology · Austria

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FLAVE is a specialized provider of premium guest and event management solutions based in Austria, targeting event organizers and businesses requiring comprehensive invitation, visitor, and check-in management services. The company offers a suite of services including hybrid events, interactive experience marketing, and event security, positioning itself as a trusted regional player with notable clients and industry awards. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates modern plugins such as Slider Revolution and Complianz for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response disclosures. Analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Twitter Ads are used with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, though the website's content and contact information support its legitimacy. Overall, FLAVE's digital presence is solid with good business credibility and privacy compliance. Strategic enhancements in security practices and transparency would further strengthen its posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flave.at

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FLAVE operates in the technology and hospitality sectors, providing event and guest management software and services primarily to B2B clients. The company leverages a business model focused on software solutions for invitation management, visitor tracking, and hybrid event facilitation. Its market positioning is supported by awards and a client portfolio including IKEA and EU-related entities, indicating competitive advantages in quality and reliability. The company targets event organizers and enterprises seeking integrated event solutions. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and continuous content updates. Partnerships with industry bodies and presence on multiple social platforms enhance its ecosystem and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates potential gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Data protection practices appear adequate with anonymized analytics and no exposed sensitive data. The security culture could be improved by publishing clear security policies and contact channels for abuse or incidents. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Maintain and document data retention policies and privacy practices to reinforce GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flave - premium guest and event solution
Description
premium guest and event solution
Key services
Invitation Management, Visitor Management, Check-in Solutions, Hybrid Events, Interactive Experience Marketing, Event Security, FLAVE Event Cockpit
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Divi Theme, Slider Revolution, Yoast SEO, WP Fastest Cache, Complianz Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Livefeeder
Marketing tools
Complianz Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on event and guest management solutions.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. Technical stack is modern and uses popular WordPress plugins and themes.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain emails and phone numbers.
  8. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Divi theme, supported by popular plugins such as Slider Revolution and Complianz for cookie management. The tech stack is well-established and widely supported, facilitating ease of maintenance and scalability. Performance is moderate with caching plugins employed, though image lazy loading and optimization could be further enhanced. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO is addressed through meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential plugin vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flave.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flave.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.