Skip to main content

Security report for find-searcher.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Find-searcher.com is a newly established web search interface launched in 2025, providing users with a simple search bar featuring autocomplete suggestions. The site redirects search queries internally to a search results page. The business model appears to be centered around offering search services, targeting a general audience. The website employs third-party consent management tools to comply with GDPR regulations and uses analytics services such as Microsoft Clarity for user behavior tracking. However, the domain is very new, limiting historical trust indicators. Technically, the website uses legacy jQuery 1.11.3 and integrates consent management scripts from consentmanager.net. The site is hosted under a domain registered with PublicDomainRegistry.com and uses DNS servers from ztomy.com. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. No CMS or major frameworks are detected, indicating a custom-built or lightweight platform. From a security perspective, the site lacks DNSSEC and does not show evidence of security headers like CSP or HSTS. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. The domain registration is minimal with no registrant details, which reduces trustworthiness. The site does implement a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy, which supports basic privacy compliance. Overall, the website is functional but basic in design and security posture. It is suitable for general audiences and does not contain adult or explicit content. Strategic improvements in security hardening, domain trust signals, and richer business information would enhance credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching find-searcher.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a search engine interface with autocomplete functionality, targeting general web users. Its business model likely relies on search-related monetization, possibly through advertising or affiliate links, although no explicit ad networks are identified. The site is newly launched in 2025, with no visible parent company or subsidiaries. The presence of a privacy policy hosted on a related domain (skenzo.com) suggests some partnership or shared infrastructure. The lack of contact emails or phone numbers limits direct customer engagement. The site uses third-party consent management and analytics tools, indicating awareness of regulatory and marketing needs. Market positioning and competitive advantages are unclear due to minimal business information.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with some positive indicators such as clientTransferProhibited domain status and GDPR cookie consent implementation. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of security headers, and use of outdated JavaScript libraries present vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy pages are found, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The domain's recent registration and minimal WHOIS data reduce trust. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators are detected, but improvements in security best practices are recommended to mitigate risks and enhance compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to avoid known vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish clear security policies and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance business credibility by providing verifiable contact details and company information on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A web search engine interface providing a search bar with autocomplete suggestions and search redirection to internal search results.
Key services
web search interface, autocomplete suggestions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.3, Consentmanager.net CMP, Custom JavaScript for autocomplete and tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent management implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Clarity (Microsoft Clarity)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
kafkaLogPixelLib, clarity.ms
Marketing tools
Consentmanager.net CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple search engine interface with autocomplete functionality.
  2. Uses third-party consent management platform for GDPR compliance.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; contact form link present.
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  6. Domain is very new and registered with a common registrar.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Tracking and analytics scripts are present, including Microsoft Clarity.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a lightweight custom front-end with jQuery 1.11.3 and integrates third-party consent management and analytics scripts. Hosting and DNS are managed via PublicDomainRegistry.com and ztomy.com respectively. The site lacks a CMS and modern JavaScript frameworks. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO and accessibility features are minimal but present. The site uses multiple external domains for fonts, scripts, and consent management. No advanced frameworks or platforms are detected. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security enhancements. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100 +5Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 60/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with find-searcher.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review find-searcher.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.