Security report for feedspring.com
FeedSpring · Technology · N/a
FeedSpring is a technology company specializing in providing customizable social media feed integrations for websites built on platforms like Webflow, Framer, and standard HTML. Their service enables businesses and developers to embed feeds from Instagram, Google Reviews, TikTok, and other social platforms seamlessly, enhancing website engagement and social proof. Positioned as a niche SaaS provider, FeedSpring targets web developers, marketers, and businesses seeking no-code or low-code solutions for social media integration. The website demonstrates a professional and modern design, with clear navigation and strong branding consistency.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
1 finding rated critical or high in the checks that completed. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak SSL Key Length
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
- CWE-326
- OWASP A04:2025
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-13: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-13: Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching feedspring.com
Only DNS and email could be checked this time. Monitoring re-checks every day and emails you when something material changes.
Daily monitoring
€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 75
- Average
- 75
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- Email security: did not complete in this scan.
- DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
- Network security: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
- Add terms of service and security incident response information to enhance transparency and legal protection.
- Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
- Provide clear and verified contact information, including security and business inquiry emails or phone numbers.
- Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- FeedSpring
- Description
- Create customizable social media feeds for Instagram, Google Reviews, TikTok, and more. Perfect for Webflow, Framer, and HTML. Build your ideal feed with FeedSpring!
- Key services
- Customizable social media feeds, Integration with Instagram, Google Reviews, TikTok, Dribbble, Pre-built components and developer tools
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Inter), Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, Google reCAPTCHA, Crisp Chat, Lottie animations, JavaScript ES6 modules, CDN hosted assets
- Frameworks
- Webflow, Lottie for animations
- Platforms
- Webflow hosting, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity
- Performance
- fast
- Mobile
- excellent
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security headers
- Third-party chat and analytics scripts asynchronously loaded
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Google Analytics 4, Microsoft Clarity
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- basic
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Google Ads
- Tracking pixels
- Microsoft Clarity
- Marketing tools
- Google Ads, Microsoft Clarity, Crisp Chat
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
- No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
- No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content or metadata.
- Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
- Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers.
- WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency.
- Content is business-focused, safe, and targeted at web developers and marketers.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with feedspring.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedspring.com.