Skip to main content

Security report for euromonitor.com

Euromonitor International · Other · N/a

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Euromonitor International is a leading global provider of market research and data analytics services, specializing in delivering insights into markets, industries, economies, and consumer behavior. The company targets businesses and professionals seeking comprehensive data to unlock growth opportunities. Their business model revolves around subscription-based access to research and analytics services, positioning them as a key player in the market research industry. The website reflects a mature enterprise-level digital presence with professional branding and consistent content quality. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust for consent management, and AWS Cloudfront for content delivery. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, has good accessibility features, and demonstrates solid SEO practices. Performance is moderate, supported by CDN and asynchronous script loading. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a DigiCert SSL certificate and implements standard security headers. Consent management is actively used to comply with privacy regulations. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response details, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy standards, but the lack of WHOIS data and registrant information introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, providing vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing transparency around data protection officer contacts and certifications.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of euromonitor.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      DMARC not enforcing

      DMARC policy is set to "none"

      What to do: Gradually move to "quarantine" then "reject" policy

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

Keep watching euromonitor.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Euromonitor International holds a strong market position as a global leader in market research and data analytics. Their competitive advantage lies in comprehensive, cutting-edge research offerings that serve diverse industries and geographies. The business model is subscription and service-based, targeting corporate clients and professionals. Revenue streams likely include subscriptions, custom research projects, and consulting. The company maintains an active partnership ecosystem, evidenced by integrations with analytics and marketing platforms. Growth indicators include a robust digital presence and consistent content updates. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding digital analytics capabilities and enhancing compliance transparency to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong SSL configuration, and implementation of key security headers. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure program indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is evident through consent management. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced public communication of security practices and incident handling procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security team to enhance compliance and communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance documentation of certifications and compliance frameworks to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Euromonitor International
Description
Euromonitor helps you unlock growth with our cutting-edge research into markets, industries, economies and consumers.
Key services
Market research, Industry analysis, Consumer insights, Economic data
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust Consent Management, Tableau JavaScript API, Lodash, Typekit Fonts, Mouseflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of DigiCert SSL certificate
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, Mouseflow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing UET, Mouseflow
Marketing tools
OneTrust Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong use of analytics and marketing tools with consent management.
  3. No visible security or privacy policy gaps on the website.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trust score.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. Contact information is available via contact page and forms.
  8. Social media presence is active and consistent with brand.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack leveraging cloud-based CDN (AWS Cloudfront), advanced analytics (Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights), and consent management (OneTrust). It uses asynchronous loading of scripts and modern font embedding via Typekit, contributing to good performance and user experience. The presence of Tableau JavaScript API indicates integration with advanced data visualization tools. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Technical risks are minimal, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euromonitor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euromonitor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.