Skip to main content

Security report for euromonitor.com

Euromonitor International · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Euromonitor International is a globally recognized leader in market research and data analytics, providing organizations with comprehensive insights to drive strategic growth. Founded in 1972, the company operates worldwide with multiple offices across key regions including the UK, USA, Asia, and Latin America. Their core services include market research reports, data analytics, and strategic business insights tailored for enterprises seeking to understand markets, industries, and consumer behavior. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content targeting business clients globally. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust for consent management, and Tableau for data visualization embedding. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, supported by comprehensive SEO metadata and structured data. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates a sophisticated approach to digital marketing and user engagement. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers to protect users. Consent management for cookies is actively managed, reflecting compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency in security governance. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trustworthiness but is mitigated by the company's established brand and global footprint. Overall, Euromonitor.com presents as a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious website suitable for its business audience. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, enhancing transparency around vulnerability disclosures, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euromonitor.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Euromonitor International holds a strong market position as a leading provider of market research and data analytics services. Their competitive advantage lies in their global reach, comprehensive data sets, and strategic insights that empower businesses to make informed decisions. The business model is subscription-based, offering access to detailed reports and analytics platforms. Revenue streams likely include report sales, data subscriptions, and consulting services. Target customers are enterprises, government agencies, and non-profits requiring market intelligence. Growth indicators include a broad international office network and active digital marketing. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with integrations of analytics and marketing tools. Operationally, the company demonstrates maturity in digital presence and content strategy, supporting sustained market leadership.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong SSL configuration, and implementation of multiple security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. Privacy compliance is evidenced by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with active consent management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents a gap in security transparency and readiness. The absence of WHOIS data raises minor concerns about domain registration legitimacy but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and incident response communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security governance and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information and procedures on the website.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards for inclusivity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Euromonitor International
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Euromonitor International
Description
Euromonitor is the first destination for organisations seeking growth. They provide truly global insight and data, so companies can make strategic decisions with confidence.
Key services
Market research reports, Data analytics, Strategic insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust Consent Management, Tableau embedding API, Lodash, Mouseflow, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Sopro.io, Zaius
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Mouseflow
Marketing tools
Sopro.io, Zaius
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong global presence with multiple office addresses and localized contact numbers.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented.
  4. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicating mature digital marketing.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond standard legal pages.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  7. No forms detected in provided HTML snippet; likely uses client-side or external forms.
  8. No explicit security incident or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure leverages a modern and diverse technology stack including analytics (Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity), marketing tools (Sopro.io, Zaius), consent management (OneTrust), and data visualization (Tableau embedding API). The site uses asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize performance and includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and rich results. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with good accessibility practices. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euromonitor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euromonitor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.