Skip to main content

Security report for envipartner.cz

ENVIPARTNER, s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENVIPARTNER, s.r.o. is a Czech company specializing in environmental consulting and services primarily targeted at municipalities, cities, and companies across the Czech Republic. Their offerings include asset management through pasportization, emergency and flood planning, strategic documentation, grant consultancy, and digital mapping solutions. The company positions itself as a reliable and experienced partner with a strong local presence and a network of related service websites enhancing their market reach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, reflecting a moderate to good level of digital maturity. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie and GDPR policy page but lacks an active consent mechanism. Overall, the website and domain registration data indicate a legitimate, professional business with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of envipartner.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching envipartner.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the government and environmental consulting sector, focusing on providing specialized services to public sector entities and private firms in the Czech Republic. Their business model revolves around expert consulting, project management, and digital solutions for environmental and municipal asset management. The presence of multiple related domains suggests a diversified service portfolio and strategic partnerships. The domain age (since 2009) supports a stable market presence. The company leverages modern web technologies and maintains active social media channels, enhancing customer engagement and brand visibility. However, the absence of explicit contact emails and phone numbers on the homepage may limit direct customer outreach. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offerings and long-term experience in the local market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The use of Google Tag Manager is standard for analytics but introduces moderate user tracking. The lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file indicates gaps in security best practices. No incident response contact information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and handling of security issues. The cookie policy exists but lacks an active consent mechanism, which may affect full GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a clear vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Introduce an explicit cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish incident response and security contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ENVIPARTNER, s.r.o.
Description
Společnost ENVIPARTNER se specializuje na odborné poradenství a služby v oblasti životního prostředí pro obce, města a firmy v České republice. Nabízí pasportizaci, tvorbu havarijních a povodňových plánů, strategických dokumentů, dotační poradenství, digitální technické mapy a další služby zaměřené na udržitelný rozvoj a ochranu životního prostředí.
Key services
Pasportizace, Havarijní plány, Strategické dokumenty, Vodohospodářské projekty, Povodňová prohlídka, Povodňové plány, Dotační poradenství, Digitální technická mapa, Aplikace WEGAS, Aplikace GISELLA
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.3, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO plugin, IntersectionObserver API, Google Fonts (Red Hat Display)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on environmental consulting and services for municipalities and companies in Czech Republic.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via dedicated contact page.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube is clearly linked.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond cookie/GDPR page found.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Use of modern technologies and SEO best practices via Yoast plugin.
  8. Multiple related domains linked in footer indicating a network of specialized service sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 5.3.3 for responsive design and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site uses modern web standards including IntersectionObserver for lazy loading images, improving performance and user experience. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin with structured data (JSON-LD) implemented for rich search results. Hosting is provided by cesky-hosting.eu, a Czech hosting provider, which aligns with the local business focus. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but could benefit from further speed optimizations. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved to meet higher standards. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but lacks advanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 74/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with envipartner.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review envipartner.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.