Skip to main content

Security report for envipartner.cz

ENVIPARTNER, s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENVIPARTNER, s.r.o. is a Czech-based company specializing in environmental consulting and municipal services, focusing on asset management, flood planning, strategic documentation, and digital mapping solutions. The company positions itself as a reliable partner for municipalities and businesses across the Czech Republic, offering a broad portfolio of services including pasportization, emergency plans, and EU funding advisory. Their market presence is supported by a well-structured website and multiple partner domains, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, reflecting a moderate to good digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and cookie policies present but lacking explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness with room for enhancement in security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching envipartner.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the government and environmental consulting sectors, targeting municipalities and local governments in the Czech Republic. Their business model revolves around providing specialized consulting services and digital tools for environmental management and municipal asset oversight. The presence of multiple partner domains suggests a strong partnership network enhancing service offerings. The domain age of over 14 years supports a stable market position. The company leverages modern web technologies and maintains active social media channels, indicating engagement with their audience. However, the absence of explicit contact details on the main page may limit direct customer engagement. The company appears to focus on quality and reliability, emphasizing long-term client relationships and practical solutions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. Privacy policies exist but do not include active consent mechanisms, potentially exposing the company to GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, establishing a security.txt file, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve site security.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  3. Enhance privacy compliance by integrating a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements.
  4. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible to users and partners.
  5. Include explicit and verified contact information for customer and security communications.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ENVIPARTNER, s.r.o.
Description
Společnost ENVIPARTNER se specializuje na širokou škálu služeb, které pomáhají obcím a městům efektivně spravovat a chránit jejich majetek a životní prostředí. Poskytují komplexní řešení v oblasti pasportizace, tvorby havarijních plánů, strategických dokumentů a dotací pro obce a města. Dále se specializují na povodňové plány a povodňové prohlídky, dotační poradenství a digitální technické mapy.
Key services
Pasportizace, Havarijní plány, Strategické dokumenty, Vodohospodářské projekty, Povodňová prohlídka, Povodňové plány, Dotační poradenství, Digitální technická mapa, Aplikace WEGAS, Aplikace GISELLA
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.3, Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO plugin, IntersectionObserver API, Google Fonts (Red Hat Display)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language targeting municipalities and companies in the Czech Republic.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanisms.
  5. No terms of service or security policies found.
  6. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube confirmed.
  9. Multiple related partner domains linked in footer.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 5.3.3 for responsive design and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images and background elements, improving load times. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA roles and semantic HTML. Hosting is provided by cesky-hosting.eu, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the business location. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some opportunities exist for further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with envipartner.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review envipartner.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.