Enable JavaScript · Technology · N/a
Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
Enable-JavaScript.com is a specialized educational website dedicated to providing clear, step-by-step instructions on how to enable JavaScript in the most popular web browsers. The site targets general internet users who may have JavaScript disabled and aims to improve their browsing experience by enabling this essential web technology. The website is small in scale, with a focused content offering and multi-language support to reach a global audience. The business model is informational and free access, with some partner links and supporters listed. Technically, the website employs a traditional web stack including jQuery 1.11.2, Lightbox for image display, and analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Analytics. The site uses HTTPS and asynchronous script loading, contributing to a moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and hreflang for internationalization. However, some technical debt is present due to the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of modern security headers. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security policies, vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and security headers that are considered best practices. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie banner present but no formal privacy or terms of service pages. The contact information is limited to an email address, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional policies and technical controls. The overall risk assessment is low given the site's informational nature and lack of sensitive data handling. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, updating JavaScript libraries, publishing privacy and security policies, and adding a security.txt file for vulnerability reporting. These improvements would enhance trust, compliance, and security culture, supporting the site's continued reliability and user confidence.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention enable-javascript.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for enable-javascript.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with enable-javascript.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enable-javascript.com.