Skip to main content

Security report for easycookie.io

SIMPLO s.r.o. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EasyCookie is a small technology company (SIMPLO s.r.o.) providing GDPR cookie consent management solutions primarily targeting website owners and digital agencies. Their SaaS platform offers features such as automatic cookie scanning, customizable consent banners, multi-language support, and integration with Google Consent Mode v2 to help clients maintain compliance with privacy regulations. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, responsive layout, and transparent pricing plans including a free tier to attract new users. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, JavaScript, and Laravel backend inferred from cookies. The site is served over HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, though some security headers are missing. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categorization and user consent options. Analytics tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar are used for user behavior tracking, with moderate user tracking levels. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as CSRF protection and HTTPS enforcement. However, the absence of a published privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response contacts are notable gaps. The WHOIS data is not publicly available due to privacy protection, which is common for small SaaS providers but slightly reduces transparency. No signs of malware or phishing were detected, and the content is safe for general audiences. Overall, EasyCookie presents a trustworthy and functional GDPR compliance solution with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security header implementation. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching easycookie.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EasyCookie operates in the niche market of GDPR cookie consent management, leveraging a SaaS subscription model with tiered pricing plans. Their competitive advantage lies in easy integration, automatic cookie scanning, and support for Google Consent Mode v2, appealing to website owners and digital agencies. The company targets primarily European markets given GDPR focus but does not explicitly state country. The presence of a dedicated agency contact email suggests a partnership ecosystem with digital agencies. Growth indicators include a free trial offering and multi-domain management capabilities. The business model relies on recurring revenue from monthly subscriptions with technical support for paid tiers. The company branding is consistent and professional, supporting a credible market position in privacy compliance technology.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection via XSRF-TOKEN cookie. The cookie consent banner aligns with GDPR requirements, providing user control over cookie categories. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency and readiness. The lack of a privacy policy page is a compliance gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small SaaS provider but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page linked prominently on the website to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance site security.
  3. Add terms of service and incident response contact information to provide transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIMPLO s.r.o.
Description
With Easycookie you can set up your website for GDPR in a few minutes.
Key services
Cookie consent banner, Automatic cookie scanning, Customizable templates, Multi-language support, Google Consent Mode v2 integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, JavaScript, Laravel (backend inferred from cookie), HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Laravel
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of XSRF-TOKEN cookie for CSRF protection
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented with detailed cookie categories and descriptions
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone
  5. Pricing plans are transparent and include a free tier
  6. Use of modern technologies and Google Consent Mode v2 integration
  7. WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, indicating privacy protection
  8. No security.txt or incident response info found
  9. No certifications or compliance badges displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Laravel backend (inferred), JavaScript, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The front-end is built with HTML5 and CSS3, optimized for mobile devices and multiple browsers. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS detected, likely a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Technical debt appears low but security header omissions represent a risk. Opportunities exist to modernize security posture and improve accessibility compliance to reduce technical risks impacting business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with easycookie.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review easycookie.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.