Skip to main content

Security report for droitthemes.com

DroitThemes · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DroitThemes is a specialized provider of premium WordPress themes, plugins, and templates, focusing on enhancing the WordPress ecosystem with high-quality Elementor addons and multipurpose themes. Established in 2016, the company targets WordPress users and developers seeking professional tools to build websites efficiently. Their market position is supported by positive customer testimonials, active social media presence, and partnerships with marketplaces like Themeforest. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, integrating advanced marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter Ads. The infrastructure is hosted with NameCheap and uses secure HTTPS connections, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Security measures include reCAPTCHA on forms and domain transfer protection, but the site lacks some HTTP security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website demonstrates a good balance of business credibility, technical implementation, and security posture, suitable for its niche audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching droitthemes.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a digital product sales business model, offering WordPress themes and plugins primarily through its own website and third-party marketplaces like Themeforest. Its competitive advantage lies in a focused product suite tailored for Elementor users and a strong emphasis on user experience and support. Revenue streams likely include direct sales, affiliate programs, and possibly subscription models for updates and support. The target customer segments are small to medium businesses, web developers, and agencies using WordPress. Growth indicators include active marketing via social media and email campaigns, as well as continuous product updates. The partnership ecosystem includes Themeforest and various marketing platforms. Strategic observations suggest maintaining product quality and expanding compliance and security measures to enhance trust and market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. Use of Google reCAPTCHA on signup forms mitigates automated abuse. However, the absence of DNSSEC and HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No explicit incident response or security policy information is provided, which may impact readiness for security events. Data protection practices appear standard for WordPress sites but could benefit from enhanced transparency and controls. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve trust and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain compatibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DroitThemes
Description
DroitThemes is an amazing source you can use to build your website using our exceptional WordPress themes, plugins, HTML templates & PSD templates.
Key services
WordPress themes, WordPress plugins, HTML templates, PSD templates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.4, Yoast SEO 26.1.1, jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Ads tracking, Owl Carousel, Swiper, Parallax JS, Redux Framework
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on signup form
  • Use of security nonce tokens in AJAX calls
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Ads tracking
Marketing tools
LeadFeader Email Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress theme and plugin provider.
  2. Content is rich with product descriptions, testimonials, and social proof.
  3. Multiple social media channels are actively linked.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Security practices are adequate but could be improved with additional headers and DNSSEC.
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, though privacy policy is present.
  7. Forms include login, signup with reCAPTCHA, and password recovery.
  8. Use of modern WordPress plugins and frameworks.
  9. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress 6.8.3 platform with Elementor 3.32.4 and Yoast SEO for content management and optimization. It uses a variety of JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Swiper, and parallax effects to enhance user experience. Marketing and analytics integrations include Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter Ads tracking, indicating a mature digital marketing setup. The hosting environment is managed via NameCheap with custom DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and implement DNSSEC. The site structure and metadata are well-formed, supporting SEO and social sharing effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with droitthemes.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review droitthemes.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.