Skip to main content

Security report for dragonforms.com

Omeda · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dragonforms.com is a domain owned and managed by Omeda, serving as a form hosting URL for their clients. The website itself is minimalistic, containing only basic information about ownership and links to Omeda's main homepage and privacy policy. The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on providing form hosting services to other businesses. The domain has been registered since 2016, indicating a stable presence in its niche. The website lacks interactive elements, forms, or detailed business information, serving primarily as a pointer to the parent company.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of dragonforms.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dragonforms.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Omeda positions itself as a service provider specializing in form hosting, likely supporting digital marketing and data collection efforts for its clients. The business model revolves around providing backend infrastructure for forms rather than direct consumer engagement. The lack of detailed contact information or marketing content on this domain suggests it is a supporting asset rather than a primary customer-facing site. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and domain registration practices, with no suspicious patterns detected. The target audience is businesses requiring form hosting solutions.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic. The domain is registered with clientTransferProhibited status, which helps prevent unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration details from the provided data. No incident response or security policies are published on the site. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms and terms of service indicates limited privacy compliance measures. Overall, the site demonstrates minimal security best practices, with room for improvement in DNS security and HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data in transit.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies to improve compliance and transparency.
  5. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism if cookies or tracking technologies are used.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Omeda
Description
This domain is owned and managed by Omeda as the form hosting URL for their clients.
Key services
Form hosting for clients
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a simple placeholder page indicating domain ownership and purpose.
  2. No forms or interactive elements present on the page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No social media links or scripts detected.
  5. Minimal metadata present; no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data found.
  6. No cookie or terms of service policies detected on this page.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long expiry date.
  9. Website serves as a redirect or pointer to the parent company Omeda.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and minimal metadata. No modern frameworks, CMS, or JavaScript libraries were detected. Hosting appears to be managed via Dynadot Inc as registrar with DNS hosted on UberNS name servers. Performance and mobile optimization are basic due to the minimal content. SEO and accessibility features are minimal, with no structured data or Open Graph tags present. The site serves primarily as a placeholder or redirect, indicating low technical complexity but also limited user engagement capabilities. There is an opportunity to modernize the site with improved metadata, responsive design, and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 −5Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dragonforms.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dragonforms.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.