Skip to main content

Security report for domaintools.com

DomainTools · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DomainTools is a leading provider of Internet intelligence and cybersecurity domain intelligence solutions, offering enterprise-grade products such as the Iris Intelligence Platform, Farsight DNSDB, and Threat Intelligence Feeds. Their services are designed to empower security teams to detect, investigate, and mitigate cyber threats effectively. The company positions itself as a global leader in this niche, targeting performance-driven security teams and elite enterprises. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity, ensuring good performance, SEO, and analytics capabilities. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, implements security headers, and uses cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature security posture. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly detailed, which could be improved. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized, with minor gaps in transparency around security disclosures and WHOIS data privacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching domaintools.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention domaintools.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,733
Employees
0
Customers
1,677
Third parties
56
Weak passwords
18%

18 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for domaintools.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DomainTools operates in the cybersecurity technology sector, focusing on domain and Internet intelligence services. Their business model revolves around subscription-based access to intelligence platforms and feeds, integrated with popular security tools like SIEM and SOAR. The company leverages partnerships and integrations to expand market reach and enhance product value. Their target customers are enterprise security teams requiring early threat detection and brand protection. The website content and structure indicate a mature organization with a strong brand presence and comprehensive client resources. The lack of public WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, common in cybersecurity firms. Marketing and analytics tools indicate active customer engagement and lead generation strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, including HSTS and CSP. Cookie consent is implemented with granular categories, supporting GDPR compliance. The use of Cloudflare Bot Management cookies indicates proactive bot mitigation. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may affect trust for security-conscious clients. Enhancing these areas would strengthen the overall security culture and compliance stance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance transparency around certifications and compliance frameworks to build trust.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DomainTools
Description
DomainTools is the global leader in Internet intelligence. Learn how our products and data are fundamental to best-in-class security programs.
Key services
Iris Intelligence Platform, Farsight DNSDB, Threat Intelligence Feeds, Integrations with SIEM, SOAR, and other security tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cloudflare Bot Management
Frameworks
Enfold WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management cookie
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Bizible
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Marketo, Microsoft Advertising, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Marketo, Bizible
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professionally presented, and focused on cybersecurity domain intelligence.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and marketing/analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented and transparent.
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact details published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-friendly infrastructure. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Marketo, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, supporting robust data collection and user engagement analysis. Performance optimizations include preconnect hints and lazy loading of images. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility are well addressed. No technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the presence of Cloudflare services suggests a reliable hosting and CDN environment. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with domaintools.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review domaintools.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.