Skip to main content

Security report for digitalworldsnfts.com

IMX Ecosystem Foundation · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IMX Ecosystem Foundation operates as a non-profit organization focused on decentralizing, growing, and securing the blockchain gaming ecosystem. Their core mission involves issuing leading tokens and token protocols for NFTs and blockchain games, positioning themselves as a foundational entity within the web3 gaming community. The website content is professionally presented, targeting blockchain developers and enthusiasts, with clear initiatives around decentralization, security, and growth. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with moderate performance and basic accessibility features. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring secure communications. However, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies indicates room for improvement in security and compliance. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS usage and no visible sensitive data exposure. Yet, the lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No forms on the site collect sensitive data directly; external Google Forms are used for developer applications and contact, which may pose risks if not properly secured. Overall, the website presents a moderate risk profile with strong business intent but gaps in compliance and domain transparency. Strategic improvements in privacy policies, security headers, and WHOIS transparency are recommended to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching digitalworldsnfts.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IMX Ecosystem Foundation is positioned as a niche non-profit within the blockchain gaming sector, focusing on token issuance and ecosystem support. Their business model centers on fostering decentralization and growth through developer incentives and security initiatives. The foundation targets blockchain developers, NFT creators, and the broader web3 gaming community. Their partnership ecosystem includes social media engagement on Twitter and LinkedIn, enhancing community reach. The absence of detailed company registration and WHOIS data limits full business intelligence but the professional web presence and clear mission suggest a legitimate operation with growth potential in the emerging blockchain gaming market.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits readiness for security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the organization to regulatory risks. The use of external Google Forms for data collection introduces third-party dependency risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational purposes but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to enhance trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain compliance and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IMX Ecosystem Foundation
Description
IMX Ecosystem Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to the decentralization, growth and security of blockchain gaming. Their mission is to issue leading tokens and token protocols for NFTs and blockchain games.
Key services
Token issuance for NFTs and blockchain games, Developer incentives program, Security and decentralization initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information limited to a single company email; no phone or physical address found.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  5. Website uses modern Webflow CMS and includes Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is present and properly configured.
  7. No forms collecting personal data except external Google Forms for developer incentives and contact.
  8. Social media presence on Twitter and LinkedIn is active and linked.
  9. Content is focused on blockchain gaming ecosystem foundation and developer incentives.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Analytics via gtag.js for tracking. Hosting is provided by Webflow's CDN infrastructure, ensuring reliable delivery and moderate performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal, with no structured data or JSON-LD detected. Security headers are absent, and privacy compliance mechanisms are missing. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance integrations to reduce risks and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with digitalworldsnfts.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review digitalworldsnfts.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.