Skip to main content

Security report for dfktv2.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.dfktv2.com presents itself as a chatbot application focused on conversation marketing and business automation without coding. The content is minimal but indicates a technology-oriented service aimed at businesses seeking automation solutions. The technical infrastructure is basic, utilizing standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and external font and CDN services from Bunny Fonts and Bunny CDN. The site appears mobile-optimized with moderate performance but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS identification. Security posture is weak due to the absence of visible security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site lacks critical compliance and contact information, which impacts its credibility and security standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dfktv2.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to operate in the technology sector, specifically offering chatbot and conversation marketing solutions likely via a SaaS or software model. The target audience is businesses interested in automating their operations without coding expertise. There is no evidence of market position, parent company, or subsidiaries. The business model likely revolves around software licensing or subscription. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or trust indicators suggests a small or early-stage operation with limited public presence or market validation.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The website lacks essential security headers and policies such as privacy, cookie, and terms of service. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The absence of WHOIS registration data further undermines trust. There is no indication of vulnerability disclosures or security certifications. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking that could expose user data. Overall, the security posture is insufficient for a business-facing technology service and requires significant improvements to meet compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is complete and accurate to improve legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information including business emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and support.
  4. Implement security headers and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and provide security contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Automate your business without coding!
Key services
chatbot application, conversation marketing, business automation without coding
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bunny Fonts, Bunny CDN, Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating domain may be unregistered or very new.
  3. Website content is minimal and focused on chatbot app and business automation.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers found.
  6. No security policies or incident response information present.
  7. No certifications or trust indicators visible.
  8. Technical stack is basic with standard web technologies and CDN usage.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No external business partner or subsidiary domains identified.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technical stack with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It relies on external font services and CDN hosting for media assets. The site is mobile responsive and uses standard SEO meta tags but lacks structured data such as JSON-LD. Performance is moderate with no detected analytics or tracking scripts. There is an opportunity to modernize the stack, improve accessibility, and enhance SEO with richer metadata and structured data. Security technical debt is evident due to missing headers and policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dfktv2.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dfktv2.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.