Skip to main content

Security report for dczlin.cz

DC Zlin · Other · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

64/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DC Zlin's website is currently undergoing maintenance, presenting minimal content limited to a maintenance notice in Czech and English. The company appears to be a small entity based in the Czech Republic with a domain registered since 2004, indicating a longstanding presence. The website is built on WordPress and hosted by Wedos, utilizing standard web technologies such as jQuery and Open Sans fonts. However, the site lacks substantive business information, contact details, and policy documents, which limits its digital maturity and user engagement capabilities. From a security perspective, the website benefits from HTTPS encryption, ensuring secure data transmission. Nonetheless, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. The presence of a login form suggests some user authentication functionality, but no advanced security measures or incident response contacts are evident. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected, indicating minimal tracking or marketing activities. Overall, the website's risk profile is moderate due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, limited content, and missing security best practices. The domain's WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the entity. Strategic improvements in security headers, policy transparency, and content enrichment are advised to elevate the site's professionalism and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dczlin.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dczlin.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dczlin.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DC Zlin appears to be a small business or organization operating in the Czech Republic, with a domain established in 2004. The lack of detailed business descriptions, services, or contact information on the website limits insights into its market positioning or business model. The site currently serves as a placeholder during maintenance, which restricts visibility into its competitive advantages or revenue streams. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of social media or external business links further constrains the assessment of its ecosystem or growth indicators.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks implementation of essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are critical for mitigating risks like clickjacking and protocol downgrade attacks. The login form is present but without visible protections against brute force or CSRF attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests gaps in compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Enhance the login form security with protections against brute force and CSRF attacks.
  4. Add contact information and incident response channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DC Zlin
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, Open Sans font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure login form present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently under maintenance with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details beyond company name.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with maintenance plugin active.
  5. HTTPS is enabled with SSL certificate.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. Login form present but no visible advanced security measures.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  9. No social media or external business contact links found.
  10. WHOIS data shows domain registered since 2004 with Wedos registrar.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery libraries and uses the Open Sans font from an external provider. Hosting is provided by Wedos, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the domain registration data. The site is currently in maintenance mode, served by a WordPress maintenance plugin, which limits content availability. Performance is moderate with no evident optimization or advanced frameworks detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with minimal content and simple styling. SEO optimization is minimal, lacking meta descriptions and structured data beyond basic Open Graph tags.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dczlin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dczlin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.