Skip to main content

Security report for covercrew.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.covercrew.co.uk appears to be a minimal placeholder site hosted on the Wix platform with no substantive business content or contact information. The domain WHOIS lookup failed due to an invalid domain name error from Nominet, indicating the domain is not properly registered or active. The site lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and no security or incident response information is present. Technically, the site uses Wix's standard JavaScript libraries and polyfills but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, or security features. Overall, the security posture is weak due to missing headers and unknown SSL configuration. The domain's legitimacy is highly questionable given the WHOIS failure and lack of business data. Strategic recommendations include proper domain registration, adding privacy and security policies, improving content quality, and implementing security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching covercrew.co.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No verifiable business information or company identity is present on the website. The site title is generic ('Home | Mysite'), and no description or services are detailed. The domain is not registered according to WHOIS data, which undermines any claims of business operation. There are no partner or subsidiary domains identified. The business model, market position, and target audience cannot be determined due to lack of content.

Security posture

The website lacks critical security headers and does not provide evidence of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration details. No incident response or security contact information is available. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The site is likely vulnerable to common web security issues due to minimal security controls. The WHOIS failure and domain invalidity further raise concerns about the site's trustworthiness and legitimacy.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly with a valid registrar and ensure WHOIS data is complete and accurate.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  4. Provide clear business contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  5. Improve website content quality, accessibility, and SEO to enhance user trust and engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. WHOIS lookup failed with Nominet error indicating domain name invalid; website content is minimal and appears to be a placeholder or error page from Wix; no meaningful content or contact information found; likely domain is not properly registered or active. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, core-js, focus-within-polyfill, Intl.Segmenter polyfill
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Domain WHOIS data unavailable due to domain name invalidity
  2. Website hosted on Wix platform with minimal content
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or addresses found
  5. No social media or business trust indicators present
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  8. Content is generic placeholder with no business description
  9. Website likely inactive or placeholder site
  10. WAF or domain registration blocking WHOIS data and content access
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using standard Wix JavaScript libraries and polyfills. The site includes modern polyfills for Intl.Segmenter and uses core-js for legacy browser support. Performance appears moderate with no explicit performance optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good due to Wix's responsive design. Accessibility features are basic with some focus ring styles present. SEO metadata is minimal and generic. No advanced frameworks or analytics tools are detected. Hosting is provided by Wix's infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with covercrew.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review covercrew.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.