Skip to main content

Security report for conversoes.org

Dan's Tools · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Files-conversion.com is a small-scale technology website operated under the brand Dan's Tools, offering free online file conversion services primarily focused on video formats but also supporting audio, image, document, and archive conversions. The site is monetized through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and uses Google Analytics for user tracking. The technical infrastructure is based on standard web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and plupload for file uploads, with assets served partially via Cloudfront CDN. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenge, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status, although the site is active and functional. Overall, the site serves a niche utility function with moderate technical maturity and basic privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conversoes.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the technology sector, targeting general internet users who require free and easy file format conversions. Its business model relies on advertising revenue, with no evident paid services or subscriptions. The site is part of a broader ecosystem of tools under the Dan's Tools brand, indicating a partnership or parent relationship. The lack of detailed business contact information and WHOIS transparency limits trust and credibility. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its broad format support and free access. Growth potential may be constrained by limited branding and minimal privacy compliance. Strategic partnerships appear limited to related utility sites within the Dan's Tools network.

Security posture

The security posture of files-conversion.com is basic. The site uses HTTPS, but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected in the HTML content. Forms are present for login and registration but lack visible advanced security features. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of cookie consent despite tracking scripts indicates a gap in privacy compliance. The domain’s WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a red flag for domain legitimacy and may pose risks. Overall, the site should improve security headers, privacy mechanisms, and transparency to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear contact information and security incident response policies to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Investigate and resolve the WHOIS data unavailability to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Upgrade technical stack to latest versions and improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dan's Tools
Description
Files-conversion.com provides a free online service to convert video files between many video formats and also supports audio, image, document, archive, and other file format conversions.
Key services
Video file format conversion, Audio file conversion, Image file conversion, Document file conversion, Archive file conversion
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap 3.4.1, Font Awesome 4.0.3, Google Fonts, plupload (file uploader library), Google Analytics, Google Adsense
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Ezoic
Marketing tools
Google Adsense
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers free online file conversion services primarily for video files.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for an active domain.
  3. Site uses Google Analytics and Adsense for monetization and tracking.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service pages exist but are basic.
  6. No visible cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of tracking.
  7. Site uses older versions of Bootstrap and Font Awesome.
  8. No advanced security headers or policies detected in HTML content.
  9. No evidence of adult or NSFW content.
  10. Site navigation includes multiple conversion tools and related utilities.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery, and Bootstrap 3.4.1. It uses plupload for file uploads and Google Fonts for typography. The site loads assets from multiple external domains including Cloudfront CDN and Google services. Performance is moderate with some use of asynchronous scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is supported by meta tags but could be improved. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The site lacks modern security headers and advanced privacy features. Technical debt is indicated by use of older Bootstrap and Font Awesome versions. Opportunities exist to modernize the stack, enhance security, and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conversoes.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conversoes.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.