Skip to main content

Security report for contentflow.net

Contentflow Livestreaming · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Contentflow Livestreaming is a specialized SaaS provider offering a comprehensive cloud-based live streaming platform tailored for corporate communication, marketing, and virtual/hybrid events. The company has a long-standing domain registration since 2002, indicating an established presence. Their platform supports multistreaming, video management, embedding, and subtitle features, targeting businesses and media organizations seeking professional live streaming solutions. The website demonstrates good content quality, professional design, and clear navigation, supported by a modern WordPress infrastructure with integrations such as Google Analytics, Hubspot, and Vimeo. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no critical vulnerabilities detected, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, Contentflow presents a credible and trustworthy online presence with a focus on delivering reliable live streaming services.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of contentflow.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching contentflow.net

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Contentflow positions itself in the technology and media sectors, focusing on live streaming software for professional and corporate clients. Their business model revolves around SaaS delivery of live streaming tools, including multistreaming and media management. The presence of notable clients and European Commission support enhances their market credibility. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like Hubspot and Google for marketing and analytics. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website, active social media presence, and integration of modern marketing tools. The company targets businesses requiring scalable and secure live streaming solutions, differentiating itself by offering an all-in-one platform that simplifies live content distribution and management.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent and privacy policies indicate awareness of GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not clearly present, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The use of third-party services is managed with consent mechanisms, reducing privacy risks. Incident response and security policy documents are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for privacy and security compliance.
  5. Maintain up-to-date WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Contentflow Livestreaming
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Contentflow Livestreaming
Description
Contentflow distributes your live content and ensures greater reach and engagement. It offers everything you need for professional live streams.
Key services
Live streaming software, Multistreaming to social media, Video management, Player embedding, Subtitles, Stream sources management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hubspot, Vimeo, YouTube, Google Maps, Real Cookie Banner Pro, WPBakery Page Builder, Salient Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security plugins (implied by cookie banner and analytics management)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hubspot
Marketing tools
Hubspot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Professional live streaming SaaS platform targeting corporate and media clients
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  4. Use of multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and media embedding
  5. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges
  6. Good SEO and social media integration
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 using the Salient theme and WPBakery Page Builder, indicating a mature and widely supported CMS platform. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hubspot, Vimeo, and YouTube for analytics, marketing, and media embedding. The hosting and DNS are managed via INWX GmbH and Google Domains respectively. Performance is moderate with some optimizations like lazy loading and preloading fonts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is supported by Rank Math PRO. Accessibility is basic but present. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business needs, though some improvements in security headers and performance tuning could be beneficial.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 59/100 +6Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 53/100 −5Medium30 findingsView report
  3. 58/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with contentflow.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review contentflow.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.