Skip to main content

Security report for consentmanager.net

consentmanager · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Consentmanager is a leading Consent Management Platform (CMP) specializing in helping websites achieve GDPR, ePrivacy, and CCPA compliance through cookie consent solutions and privacy policy generation. The company serves over 25,000 websites, including major brands, positioning itself as a trusted provider in the privacy compliance market. Their offerings include cookie banners, Google Consent Mode integration, mobile app consent, connected TV consent, and additional compliance monitoring tools. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for SEO and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and integrates various third-party services for analytics and marketing. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure script loading, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy indicated by certifications and client references. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching consentmanager.net

This scan found 16 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
100
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Consentmanager operates a SaaS business model focused on privacy compliance solutions, targeting website owners, publishers, online shops, agencies, and international companies. Their competitive advantage lies in comprehensive GDPR and ePrivacy compliance tools, official certifications, and a broad client base including reputable brands. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for CMP services and add-ons like Legal Shield and Compliance Monitor. The company maintains an affiliate program and leverages partnerships to expand market reach. Growth indicators include multilingual support and continuous product expansion into mobile and connected TV consent. The business ecosystem is supported by integrations with major analytics and marketing platforms, enhancing value proposition and customer retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and use of official CMP scripts that support consent management and privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks published incident response contacts or a security policy, which are important for transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through the presence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Verify and ensure domain WHOIS information is complete and publicly available to avoid legitimacy concerns.
  4. Add direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the website to facilitate communication and enhance credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to maintain privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
consentmanager
Description
Consent management platform for websites. GDPR compliant. Over 30 languages, test your own design for free!
Key services
Cookie Banner, Privacy Policy Generator, Consent Management Platform, Google Consent Mode v2, Mobile App Consent, Connected TV Consent, Whistleblower Software, Legal Shield, Compliance Monitor, Accessibility Widget + Scanner
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Bootstrap (navbar, dropdowns), FontAwesome (icons), Yoast SEO (JSON-LD structured data), CMP scripts from consentmanager.net CDN, WebP Express plugin (image optimization), Typeform (popup forms), eTracker (tracking), Hurra OTI (tracking)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of official CMP scripts with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent management scripts integrated

Analytics and tracking

Services
eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
eTracker, Hurra OTI
Marketing tools
Typeform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on GDPR and privacy compliance
  3. Multiple language support and extensive client base
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly domain not registered or WHOIS server returned no match
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  8. Good integration of consent management scripts and compliance tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Bootstrap framework for responsive design and FontAwesome for icons. It uses Yoast SEO for structured data and SEO optimization, and WebP Express for image optimization. Consent management scripts are loaded asynchronously from consentmanager.net CDNs, ensuring efficient performance. Marketing and analytics tools include eTracker and Hurra OTI tracking pixels, and Typeform for interactive forms. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and fast loading times. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and security headers are missing, representing an area for technical improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100 −1Medium22 findingsView report
  2. 70/100 −10Medium21 findingsView report
  3. 80/100Low21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with consentmanager.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review consentmanager.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.