Skip to main content

Security report for conet.de

CONET · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CONET is a German IT consulting and services company specializing in digital transformation, software development, SAP solutions, managed services, and data intelligence. The company targets business clients seeking comprehensive IT advisory and implementation services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design and consistent branding, supported by a proprietary CMS and hosted likely via Deutsche Telekom infrastructure. The technical stack includes jQuery, Matomo analytics, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a modern but not cutting-edge technology usage. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and privacy-aware analytics configuration, but lacks explicit security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, suitable for its business audience, but could benefit from enhanced transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of conet.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conet.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention conet.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
16
Employees
1
Customers
1
Third parties
14
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2025-08-20 · 1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for conet.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.conet.de2025-08-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CONET operates in the technology sector with a focus on IT consulting and digital transformation services. It maintains several subsidiaries under the CONET brand, indicating a medium-sized enterprise structure. The company leverages proprietary CMS technology and integrates analytics and marketing tools responsibly. The absence of visible contact details and compliance documents on the main page suggests these may be located deeper in the site or require enhancement. The company appears well-positioned in the German IT market with a clear service portfolio and consistent branding. No suspicious or unrelated domains are linked, and the domain registration aligns with the business profile, supporting legitimacy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Matomo analytics with consent set to denied by default, reflecting privacy-conscious practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No forms or input fields were detected in the provided HTML, minimizing attack surface. The absence of published incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers and publish security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide visible incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Add accessibility improvements to meet standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CONET
Description
Consulting, Customer Experience, Data Intelligence, Managed Services, SAP, Software Development. The company accompanies digital transformation.
Key services
Consulting, Customer Experience, Data Intelligence, Managed Services, SAP, Software Development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CREATOR 11.0 (CONET Media Suite)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Tag Manager loaded with consent set to denied by default
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professional and focused on IT consulting and services.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the HTML content.
  3. Uses Matomo analytics with default consent set to denied, indicating privacy awareness.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  6. Website uses a proprietary CMS (CONET Media Suite).
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No incident response or security contact information found.
  9. Open Graph and meta tags are well implemented for SEO and social sharing.
  10. No advertising networks detected except Matomo and Google Tag Manager.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a proprietary CMS (CONET Media Suite) with a technology stack including jQuery and Matomo analytics. Google Tag Manager is integrated with consent defaults denying ad storage, indicating privacy awareness. The site is hosted on infrastructure likely provided by Deutsche Telekom, inferred from nameservers. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of CSS and JS assets. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features appear basic. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML snippet. Technical risks are low but could be further mitigated by adding security headers and enhancing privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conet.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conet.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.