Skip to main content

Security report for computerhelp.cz

COMPUTER HELP, spol. s r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

COMPUTER HELP, spol. s r.o. is a Czech Republic based IT company founded in 1993, providing comprehensive IT services including software development, IT training, software and hardware sales, and technical support. The company holds multiple certifications and partnerships with major vendors such as Microsoft, ESET, Adobe, and HPE, positioning itself as a trusted mid-sized player in the Czech IT market. Their website is professionally designed, mobile optimized, and offers clear navigation and rich content relevant to their business. Technically, the site runs on WordPress with modern frameworks and integrates Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and GDPR-compliant cookie management. Security posture is good with HTTPS and anti-bot measures, though it lacks some security headers and explicit incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the visible business information and certifications support legitimacy. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a mature digital presence with room for security and transparency improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching computerhelp.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets IT professionals, businesses, and individual users in need of IT training, software licensing, and IT services. Their business model combines service provision with reseller activities and leasing hardware. Market positioning is strengthened by long-standing partnerships and certifications. The company shows a stable presence with a medium-sized operation and a comprehensive service portfolio. Their partnership ecosystem includes Microsoft, ESET, Adobe, and HPE, enhancing their competitive advantage. The website content and references indicate a focus on quality and customer orientation. Growth indicators include active marketing campaigns and educational webinars. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance security transparency and WHOIS data visibility to further build trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a good baseline security posture. Cookie consent is managed via a GDPR-compliant plugin, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to implement additional headers and publish security documentation to improve trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
COMPUTER HELP, spol. s r. o.
VAT number
CZ49617320
Registration number
21410 (OR v Praze odd. C vložka)
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
COMPUTER HELP, spol. s r.o.
Description
Společnost COMPUTER HELP byla založena v roce 1993 a poskytuje komplexní služby v oboru IT – počítačové kurzy pro běžné uživatele i profesionály, prodej software a licenční poradenství, technická podpora a správa sítí, programování aplikací a vývoj webů, prodej a pronájem hardware včetně operativního leasingu.
Key services
Software development, IT training, IT services and support, Software and hardware sales, Leasing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Complianz GDPR plugin, Mapy.cz API
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent management with Complianz plugin
  • Stop user enumeration plugin active

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Sklik (Seznam.cz)
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Google Ads
Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent management.
  4. Multiple trusted partner certifications and client references enhance credibility.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and security plugins observed.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, ensuring a modern and responsive design. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA enhances analytics and security. The use of Complianz GDPR plugin demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses Mapy.cz API for mapping services, indicating localization for Czech users. No hosting provider information was detected. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential outdated libraries if not regularly maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with computerhelp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review computerhelp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.