Skip to main content

Security report for companieslogo.com

CompaniesLogo.com · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CompaniesLogo.com operates a specialized online platform providing an extensive and regularly updated database of logos for publicly listed companies and ETFs. Founded in 2020, the company targets developers, businesses, and financial analysts who require reliable and up-to-date company logos integrated via an API. The website offers browsing by company name, country, and category, emphasizing ease of access and comprehensive coverage. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies with Cloudflare DNS and GoDaddy hosting, delivering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain ownership protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are absent. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Business credibility is supported by transparent WHOIS data and consistent domain registration. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching companieslogo.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market segment providing logo data services and API access for publicly listed companies and ETFs. Its business model likely relies on API subscriptions and data licensing. The platform's comprehensive logo database and manual update process provide competitive advantages in data accuracy and freshness. The target customers include developers, financial websites, and apps needing official logos. The company demonstrates moderate growth potential given the specialized service and API offering. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The website content and structure support a professional image, though additional trust signals such as certifications or testimonials are absent.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain registration locks, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces resilience against DNS spoofing and common web attacks. No published security policy or incident response contacts limit transparency and preparedness. The site does not implement cookie consent mechanisms, which may affect GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting recommended best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  2. Implement and display a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant security certifications or trust badges to enhance credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CompaniesLogo.com
Description
CompaniesLogo.com maintains an up-to-date database containing logos of publicly listed companies (stocks) and ETFs. The database includes 12,416 logos, with 10,620 in SVG format. The logos are manually checked approximately every 3 months for updates. The service offers an API for automatic logo integration into websites and apps.
Key services
Company logo database, Stock logo API, Logo browsing by name, country, and category
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a niche service with a comprehensive logo database and API.
  2. Content is well-structured and professionally presented.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  4. No security policy or incident response information published.
  5. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript technologies, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy with Cloudflare DNS services. The site is moderately performant with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The search form is present but the submit button is disabled, suggesting limited interactive functionality. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with companieslogo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review companieslogo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.