Skip to main content

Security report for clubhouse.com

Alpha Exploration Co. · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clubhouse is a social media platform specializing in group voice notes and voice-based social interactions. The company behind the platform is Alpha Exploration Co., which positions itself as a significant player in the social audio space. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear calls to action to download the app and engage with the platform. The target audience is general users interested in voice communication and social networking. The business model revolves around providing a unique voice-based social experience, leveraging mobile applications and web presence to engage users. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Sentry for error monitoring. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices. However, some accessibility features could be improved. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring basic transport security, but lacks explicit security headers that could enhance protection against common web attacks. From a security perspective, the site shows moderate maturity. It uses HTTPS and error monitoring but lacks visible security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are important for compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. No direct contact information or incident response details are published, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, Clubhouse's website is professional and functional with moderate security and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and transparency would strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clubhouse.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clubhouse operates in the competitive social media and communication sector, focusing on voice-based group interactions. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique voice note feature and social audio experience. The business model is primarily app-based, targeting general consumers interested in social networking through voice. The company maintains a strong brand presence with active social media channels and comprehensive privacy and terms policies. Revenue streams are likely based on user engagement and potential monetization through partnerships or premium features. The lack of visible contact information suggests a focus on digital-first customer engagement. The company appears to be large and established, though exact founding year and subsidiaries are not disclosed. The partnership ecosystem includes major social platforms and analytics providers, supporting marketing and user acquisition efforts.

Security posture

The security posture of the Clubhouse website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communication. The use of Sentry indicates proactive error monitoring. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may pose compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. No direct incident response contacts or security policies are published, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, there is room for improvement in compliance, transparency, and advanced security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact information and security policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all users, including those with disabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alpha Exploration Co.
Description
Huuuge group voice notes with all of your friends
Key services
Group voice notes, Social networking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Sentry, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected.
  3. Privacy and terms policies are present and linked.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  5. Use of modern analytics and error tracking tools.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No forms with input fields detected in the HTML content provided.
  8. Social media links to Twitter and Instagram present.
  9. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy detected.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, supported by Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for marketing analytics, and Sentry for error tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. The site lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains good meta tag usage and social media integration. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms are recommended to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clubhouse.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clubhouse.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.